SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1094

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
G.S. KULKARNI, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
Kailash Kashinathrao Pawar - Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 4415 of 2024
Decided On : 26-03-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Balasaheb Deshmukh
For the Respondents: Sachin H. Kankal, A.G.P.

The right to education is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, and cannot be denied based on the pendency of departmental or criminal proceedings against an in-service candidate.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 21 - Right to education - Denial of No Objection Certificate (NOC) to an in-service candidate for pursuing post-graduation in medicine due to pending departmental enquiry - Court held that such denial is arbitrary and infringes the right to education, which is a fundamental right under Article 21. (Paras 1, 16, 26)

(B) Education as a fundamental right - The court emphasized that the right to education is implicit in the right to life and cannot be denied based on pending proceedings that do not directly impede the candidate's ability to pursue education. (Paras 17, 22)

(C) Precedent - The court referred to previous judgments where similar denials were overturned due to prolonged departmental proceedings, establishing a precedent for timely resolution of such matters. (Paras 10, 11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a qualified doctor employed as a Medical Officer, sought an NOC to pursue a PG course but was denied due to a pending departmental enquiry stemming from matrimonial disputes.

Findings of Court:
The court found the denial of NOC arbitrary and discriminatory, emphasizing the importance of the right to education.

Issues: The main issues included whether the pendency of a departmental enquiry justifies the denial of NOC for pursuing higher education.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the right to education is fundamental and cannot be infringed upon due to pending proceedings that do not directly affect the candidate's educational pursuits.

Result: The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to grant the NOC.

JUDGMENT :

(G.S. Kulkarni, J.)

1. A short question which arises for consideration in the present proceedings is whether the right of an in-service candidate to pursue a post graduation in medicine, can be taken away by denying a 'no objection', merely for the reason of pendency of a departmental enquiry.

2. This Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for the following substantive relief.

    "a) Be pleased to issue writ of certiorari or writ in nature of certiorari, or any other appropriate writs, orders, directions, calling from the record and proceedings of the impugned order dated 30/01/2024 and 09.02.2024, and after going through the legality validity and proprietary of the same, be pleased to quash and set aside order of rejection of No objection certificate/letter dated 30/01/2024 and 09.02.2024 issued by the Respondents and further be a pleased to direct the Respondents to issue No objection certificate being in service candidate for PG Course the reasons and circumstances mentioned herein above."

3. The petitioner is a qualified doctor having an MBBS degree. He is in the service of the Government of Maharashtra as a Medical Officer, since 12th May 2015. He is presently posted at the Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, Bhiwandi, District Thane.

4. The petitioner intends to pursue a Post Graduation Course in Medicine, as an in-service candidate, for which he is required to apply for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET P.G.). To pursue the post graduation course, as an in-service candidate, he is required to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Deputy Director of Health Services-Respondent No. 2.

5. It is the petitioner's case that earlier, the petitioner had obtained a NOC in October 2021 to appear at the NEET P.G. examination. Such NOC was granted to the petitioner on 23rd February 2021. The petitioner had duly filled up the NEET P.G. 2021 application form. He appeared at the said examination in which he scored 247 marks. The petitioner had accordingly become eligible for admission to the P.G. course. However, the petitioner could not pursue the P.G. course, as the NOC granted to him, was cancelled by respondent no.2 on the ground that the petitioner was involved in criminal proceedings lodged by his wife inter alia alleging an offence punishable under Sections 493 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Also divorce proceedings were initiated between the petitioner and his wife, (Petition No. A-106/2021 dated 24th January 2024) which are stated to be disposed of by a decree of divorce being granted dissolving the marriage.

6. In the above circumstances, the petitioner, being aggrieved by the cancellation of the NOC and the consequent inability of the petitioner to pursue the P.G. course had approached this court in Writ Petition No. 4045 of 2022. By an Order dated 7th April 2022, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court rejected the said Writ Petition. Being aggrieved by such orders passed by this Court, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court by filing a Special Leave Petition, which was rejected by the Supreme Court by an Order dated 13th May 2022 which inter alia recorded that the observations made in the judgment of this Court should be restricted only for the purpose of deciding the said case and not otherwise.

7. It is the case of the petitioner that, in the earlier proceedings, the respondents had contended that the pendency of the criminal case as instituted by the petitioner's wife was not disclosed in the application filed for NOC and/or for appearing for the NEET P.G. examination. It was hence held that the recall of the NOC was justified.

8. To pursue his inherent desire and interest in higher education, the petitioner again duly filled up the relevant form for obtaining an NOC, in which he disclosed all the necessary particulars so that he would be granted an approval to appear for the NEET P.G. which is scheduled to be held in May/ June 2024. However, such application of the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top