Back
SUNIL B. SHUKRE, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA
Beena Lal Avatramani – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sunil B. Shukre, J.
Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP for the Respondents.
2. We find that this Petition involves a question of law relating to the power of the Excise Authorities to levy interest on accumulated license fees and in the opinion of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the issue is also covered by the judgments of Division Bench of this Court at Aurangabad in Writ Petition No. 13545 of 2017 decided on 21st November 2017 and order of the learned Single Judge in Civil Application No. 2300 of 2019 in Writ Petition No. 13623 of 2018, dated 21st November 2019. We have taken up this matter for final hearing by making Rule by consent of the parties.
3. The Petitioner was issued FL-II license but for some reason or the other it expired some time in the year 2000 and therefore, the Petitioner made an effort to obtain renewal of the said license. First such effort was made by the Petitioner some time in February 2017, wherein she requested that if she was given some concession in paying the renewal fees by installments, it would enable her to run the FL-II license, which was so necessary for her. It appears
Excise Authorities lack the power to levy interest on accumulated license fees under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act; interest is chargeable only from the date a fee becomes due.
The Central Government is empowered under Section 211 of the Motor Vehicles Act to levy additional fees for delayed applications related to driving licenses and vehicle registrations, which are not p....
Municipal Boards must justify licence fees based on actual services rendered; excessive fees may be deemed an illegal tax.
An interim order staying the recovery of dues does not absolve the beneficiary from the obligation to pay interest on those dues once the order is lifted; the principle of restitution mandates that t....
The imposition of an additional fee for delay in renewing fitness certificates is punitive and unauthorized under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Even Though a faint allegation is made by the petitioner that the quantification in the demand is not proper, it is not supported by any cogent and material evidence, and therefore the Panchayat is e....
License fees can be regulatory rather than tied directly to specific services, requiring reasonable correlation with total expenses incurred.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
