IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JITENDRA JAIN, M. S. SONAK
Bipin J. Bagadia – Appellant
Versus
Grand View Estates Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(M.S. Sonak J) :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By order dated 02 September 2024, this appeal was posted for final disposal at the admission stage, subject to any overnight part-heard matters.
3. Admit. Considering the orders made from time to time earlier and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal was heard finally.
4. This appeal questions the order of 09 October 2023, read with the order dated 21 December 2022, made by the Company Court disposing of the Interim Application No. 3663 of 2022 made by the first Respondent under Section 466 of the Company's Act, 1956, and staying the proceedings for the winding up of Swadeshi Mills Company Limited (in liquidation) (“said company”).
5. The first and second Appellants hold 5400 and 250 shares, respectively, in the said company. The first Respondent is a group company of the Shapoorji Pallonji Group of Companies and has 29.29% shares in the said company. The third Respondent is also a group company of Shapoorji Pallonji Group of Companies and holds 22.72% shares in the said company. Collectively, the first and third Respondents hold 52% of the shares in this said company. The fourth Respon
Sudarsan Chits (I) Ltd Vs. G. Sukumaran Pillai & Ors
M/s Meghal Homes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shree Niwas Girni K.K. Samiti & Ors.
The court emphasized that discretion under Section 466 of the Companies Act must consider public interest and prior judicial findings, not merely creditor consent.
The court has the discretion to recall winding-up orders under the Companies Act if the applicant satisfies creditor debts and presents a bona fide revival scheme, emphasizing the importance of compl....
Court emphasized that revival schemes for companies in liquidation must adhere to statutory compliance, as any unauthorized share transfer renders the scheme void.
Revival of a company in liquidation requires adherence to statutory provisions, particularly time limits, and motives for reviving cannot be deemed bona fide when driven by asset value.
The court confirmed its jurisdiction to transfer pending claims relating to a company in liquidation, reiterating the objectives of Section 446 of the Companies Act to streamline litigation and ensur....
Leave must be obtained from the Winding Up Court before proceeding against a company under liquidation, as stipulated by the Companies Act, rendering any action initiated without leave void ab initio....
The winding up of a company does not absolve the personal liability of its directors for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and such criminal proceedings can continue despi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.