SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Kar) 1310

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
E.S. INDIRESH, J.
Mr. Kirit Morzaria, S/o C.G. Morzaria - Appellant 
Versus 
International Coach Builders Limited (In Liquidation) - Respondent 
Company Application No.70 of 2025 In Company Petition No.131 of 1988
Decided on : 01-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. SAJI P. JOHN, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SMT. KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

The court has the discretion to recall winding-up orders under the Companies Act if the applicant satisfies creditor debts and presents a bona fide revival scheme, emphasizing the importance of compliance with legal standards and stakeholder interests.

Headnote:(A) Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391 to 394 and 466 - Scheme of arrangement for revival - Applicant, a shareholder and Director, seeks recall of winding-up order (30th Nov 1990) for the company 'International Coach Builders Ltd.' - The applicant has settled dues of creditors and proposed a revival scheme including vehicle scrapping and manufacturing - Official Liquidator raised objections regarding satisfaction of debts and adequacy of the proposed scheme. (Paras 1, 6, 15, 17, 19)

(B) Revival of companies in liquidation - The court retains discretion to recall winding-up orders if applicant satisfies requirements related to payment of creditors and representation of interests. Consent of shareholders and execution of revival schemes must comply with the law as established in precedents cited. (Paras 29, 31)

Findings of Court:
The Court found the applicant has adequately satisfied majority creditor claims and consented to the revival scheme which focuses on public interest. (Paras 17, 19)

Issues: Whether the winding-up order could be recalled based on the settlement of dues and the proposed revival scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that revival schemes must demonstrate bona fides and satisfy creditor claims before allowing recall of winding-up orders, stating the discretion of the court in such matters is vital for ensuring commercial morality and justice. (Paras 15, 16)

Result: Application allowed; the winding-up order dated 30th November, 1990 is stayed.

ORDER :

E.S. INDIRESH, J.

This application is filed under Section 466 and Section s 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Companies Act') read with Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Rules-1959) by the applicant-Mr. Kirit Morzaria, shareholder, Director and Creditor of the respondent- International Coach Builders Ltd., a company under liquidation, seeking sanction of the scheme of arrangement for the revival of the respondent-Company (in liquidation) and to recall the order of winding-up dated 30th November, 1990 passed by this Court.

2. In the affidavit accompanying the present application, the applicant stated that the respondent-Company (in liquidation) was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with the Registrar of Companies, Bengaluru and copy of the Memorandum of Association and the Articles of Association is produced at Annexure-A. The respondent-Company (in liquidation) is in the business of Body Building of Buses, Lorries and other Transport Vehicles. The capital structure of the respondent-Company (in liquidation) is Rs.1,21,64,000/-. The Annual Report of the respondent-Company (in liquidation) for the year 1989-90 is produced at Annexure-B.

3. It is further stated by the applicant in the affidavit that the respondent-Company (in liquidation) had taken land for lease from Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'KIADB') and at the time of liquidation, it was left with the leasehold land along with the building constructed therein, including the plant and machinery at Plot No.6 formed out of Survey No.85 of Hoskote Industrial Area, Chokkahalli, Kasaba Hobli, Hoskote Taluk. This Court, by order dated 30th November, 1990 (Annexure-C) in Company Petition No.131 of 1988 passed an order of winding-up of the respondent-Company (in liquidation).

4. It is further stated in the affidavit that the Karnataka State Financial Corporation (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'KSFC') took over the land and building along with plant and machinery, fixed assets, stocks, raw materials, stores, work-in-progress etc., of the respondent-Company under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951. Thereafter, the KSFC in terms of the order of winding-up dated 30th November, 1990 passed by this Court, was allowed to sell the land and plant and machinery. The aforesaid order was challenged in O.S.A. No.26 of 1991, which came to be dismissed on 23rd January, 1992 and thereafter, the said order passed in O.S.A. No.26 of 1991 was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in S.L.P.(Civil Appeal) No.4702 and 4703 of 1994. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, by its order dated 05th March, 2003, set-aside the order in Company Application and reserved liberty to the KSFC to move this Court, for appropriate sale proceedings. Thereafter, Company Application No.934 of 2004 was filed, which came to be allowed on 14th July, 2006, whereby, the permission was granted to the KSFC to sell the assets of the respondent-Company (in liquidation) in association with the Official Liquidator. It is also stated that, Company Application No.156 of 2011 was filed, seeking leave to publish advertisement for auction of the property. The KSFC had filed Company Application No.1719 of 2006, seeking permission to confirm the sale. In the meanwhile, the applicant in the present application had filed Company Application No.18 of 2007, seeking to implead him in the proceedings. This Court, allowed the application filed by the KSFC and application filed by the present applicant was partly allowed as per order 29th January, 2007. Being aggrieved by the same, the present applicant had filed O.S.A. No.6 of 2007. This Court, by order dated 19th December, 2008, set-aside the sale and directed the KSFC to take legal action for sale of assets of the respondent- Company (in liquidation) in accordance with law. The said order dated 19th Decembe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top