IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Rajaram Parashram Patil And Ors – Appellants
Versus
Subhash Pandurang Bandiwadekar And Ors – Respondents
With Interim Application (Stamp) No. 1523 OF 2025 (Application for Intervention) In Writ Petition No.648 Of 2025
Decided On : 21-01-2025
(A) Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Section 22 and Section 41A - Election process - Petitioners challenged the Election Officer's order excluding their names from the voters list based on their enrollment after 16 May 1999, which was previously set aside by the Division Bench - The court held that the Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by denying participation rights, as the issue of membership validity must be adjudicated in appropriate proceedings. (Paras 10, 15, 55)
(B) Jurisdiction of Election Officer - The Election Officer cannot adjudicate on membership validity while preparing the voters list, as this requires a judicial inquiry under Section 22 of the Act. (Paras 50, 55)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the exclusion from the voters list for elections to the Governing Council of Khedut Shikshan Mandal, based on their enrollment after 16 May 1999, which was previously ruled valid by the Division Bench.
Findings of Court:
The court set aside the Election Officer's order and directed inclusion of the Petitioners in the voters list, maintaining that the issue of their membership validity remains open for future adjudication.
Issues: The main issues were whether the Election Officer had the jurisdiction to exclude members based on their enrollment date and the validity of their membership.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Election Officer overstepped his authority by excluding members without proper adjudication of their enrollment validity, which must be determined in a judicial inquiry.
Result: Petition allowed; Election Officer's order set aside.
JUDGMENT :
(Sandeep V. Marne, J.)
1) Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Petition is taken up for final disposal.
THE CHALLENGE
2) Petitioners have filed this Petition challenging the order dated 10 January 2025 passed by the Election Officer nominated by the Deputy Charity Commissioner rejecting the objections raised by them to Preliminary Voters List published on 8 January 2025. Rejection of Petitioners’ objections to the preliminary voters list has resulted in non-inclusion of their names in the Final Voters List published on 13 January 2025, which is also subject matter of challenge in the present Petition. Petitioners are thus, aggrieved by denial of opportunity to participate in the election process for election of Governing Council of Khedut Shikshan Mandal, Kalkundri, Taluka-Chandgad, District-Kolhapur.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3) Brief facts leading to filing of the present Petition are that Khedut Shikshan Mandal, Kalkundri (Trust) is a registered Public Charitable Trust established on 25 February 1956, which was initially registered as Society under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It got registered as a Trust under the provisions of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 on 13 September 1963. The Trust apparently runs 7 High Schools, 3 Colleges and 1 Senior College in Chandgad, District-Kolhapur. The Trust is governed by Memorandum of Association, under which various kinds of members can be admitted to the Trust such as benefactors, barons, donors, fellows, ordinary members, life members and honorary members. All the members together formed General Body of the Trust and the supervision, control and management of the Trust is vested in the Governing Council. The Governing Council is to be elected every three years. The Governing Council upto the year 1999 was duly elected with corresponding changes being accepted by the Assistant/Deputy Charity Commissioner in Schedule-I. However, the election to the Governing Council after the year 1999 ran into rough whether as the Change Reports reporting election of Governing Council during 1999-2000 to 2015-16 are not accepted by the Dy. Charity Commissioner, not because of any disputes within the members or persons interested but essentially because of non-following of the mandatory procedures required for holding elections. It appears that the Change Report in respect of the elections of the Governing Council for the year 1999-2000 to 2001-2002 was filed on 17 October 2002. During pendency of the said Change Report, further Change Reports were filed for the years 2002-03 to 2004-2005, 2005-06 to 2007-08, 2008-09 to 2010-11 and 2010- 2011 to 2013- 2014. It appears that few additional Change Reports were also filed for reporting changes in the Governing Council due to death, resignation, etc. All the Change Reports were taken up for hearing by the Deputy Charity Commissioner and by various orders passed on 11 January 2017, the Deputy Charity Commissioner proceeded to reject all the Change Reports. The Change Reports relating to elections to the Governing Council in the year 1999-2000 to 2016-2017 were rejected inter alia holding that the occurred changes were not in accordance with law as the elections were found to have been conducted without following due procedure.
4) After rejection of the Change Reports in the manner aforesaid, one of the members Ravalnath Madkholkar filed an application under the provisions of Section 41A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act (the Act) before the Deputy Charity Commissioner for appointment of ad-hoc committee of 7 persons for conducting day-to-day affairs of the Trust. During pendency of the said application, the said member withdrew the prayer for appointment of ad-hoc committee and instead prayed for holding elections of the Trust. It appears that the said prayer was resisted by the rival group on account of existence of disputes about enrollment of members. The Dep
Krishnarao Kanhaiya Naidu and others Versus. Jeevraj Bhairavlal Agrawal and others
Shahid Javed Maniyar and another vs. Sagir Munikhan Sarguroh (DR.) and others
Gokaraju Rangaraju v. State of A.P.
Ahmednagar Zilla S.D.V. & P. Sangh Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999 from the voters list; their membership validity must be determined in future proceedings.
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999, contrary to a prior ruling, emphasizing that membership validity must be determined in appropriate proceedi....
The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by excluding members enrolled after 16 May 1999 from the voters list; their membership validity must be determined in future proceedings.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner to enroll new members were without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19(1)(c) o....
[The court established that consent terms in electoral disputes are binding and that the rejection of nominations must be based on clear and consistent grounds, emphasizing the rights of members in t....
The Court held that an election officer's direction regarding election conduct by a charity commissioner exceeds jurisdiction under Section 41A of the MPT Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.