SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VINAY JOSHI, ABHAY J. MANTRI
Jayanand S/o Arjun Dhabale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.G. Varshani
For the Respondent: A.B. Badar

JUDGMENT :

ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 02-02-2021 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad (for short ‘the learned Judge’) in Sessions Trial Case No. 51/2015, convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPC”) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one month each. They are also convicted for an offence punishable under Section 452 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one month each.

2. FACTUAL MATRIX:

    (i) Informant Kishor (PW-1) and accused No. 1-Jayanand are brothers, and the deceased Sunanda was the widow of their late brother Vijay. Kishor and Sunanda reside adjacent. Accused No. 1-Jayanand resides in front of them.

    (ii) The incident occurred on 01-05-2015 at about 9-00 a.m. On that day, Kishor and his wife heard Sunanda’s hue and cry for help from her house. So, Kishor ran there and saw that acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top