IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT GWALIOR
Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia, Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, JJ.
Hariram & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 408 of 2012
Decided On : 27-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments of the parties concerning the conviction (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and relevant laws (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. application of legal principles to the case specifics (Para 28 , 32 , 49 , 50) |
| 5. final decision of the court and directions (Para 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - The present criminal appeal under Section 374 of CrPC has been filed by appellants- Hariram and Veer Singh against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 30/03/2012 passed in ST No.45 of 2011 by Second Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Mungawali, District Ashok Nagar whereby appellant No.2-Veer Singh has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and appellant No.1- Hariram has been convicted under Section 302 /34 of IPC and both the appellants have been sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000-5,000/- with default stipulation.
2. Prosecution case, in short, is that appellants are the brothers of deceased Shishupal, whose father Nannulal, was having a tractor and land in his name and was living with deceased Shishupal. Nannual, father of the deceased, expressed his desire to appellants and deceased Shishupal that he would make partition of property consisting of one tractor and the land after payment of loan amount of tractor and expenses of marriages. As deceased Shishupal was living with his father Nannulal, therefore, appellants were having animosity with deceased Shishupal. On the fateful day i.e. 15-12- 2010 at around 08:00 pm, after completion of labour work, when deceased Shishupal came home and was standing in the courtyard of his house, at that time, appellants- accused arrived there and hurled abuses which was objected by Shishupal. Thereafter, appellant Hariram caught hold of both hands of Shishupal and appellant Veer Singh inflicted axe blow at the back of head of Shishupal as a result of which, blood started oozing. Accused Veer Singh again gave an axe blow from the blunt side on his right eye due to which Shishupal sustained swelling in his eye. On hearing screams, Bhamra, Kalla Harijan and father of deceased i.e. Nannual rushed to the spot for rescue. The appellants also threatened the deceased for dire consequences.
3. On the next day i.e. 16-12-2010 at around 09:30 in the morning, Shishupal along with father Nannulal went to police station Bahadurpur, where a report was lodged vide Crime No.279 of 2010. Matter was investigated and injured Shishupal was sent to PHC Bahadurpur for medical examination where Dr.Y.S.Tomar medically examined him. On medical examination, the doctor found incised wound on the right side of head and on the occipital region and above the right eye found contusion and swelling. The nature of injuries sustained by Shishupal were grievous on the head, therefore, he was referred to District Hospital, Ashok Nagar for X- ray. On the way to District Hospital, Ashok Nagar, Shishupal succumbed to the injuries. Dr. KK Gupta, who was posted in the District Hospital, Ashok Nagar informed in-charge of Police Station Ashok Nagar on the basis of which, merg intimation No.Q/2010 was recorded on 16-12-2010 at about 05:15 pm, copy of which was sent to Police Station Bahadurpur on 17-12-2010 at around 07:00 pm whereupon Merg No.35/2010 under Section 174 of CrPC was recorded regarding the death of Shishupal. On 17-12-2010, for conduction of postmortem of deceased safina form and Naksha Panchnama were prepared and thereafter, Dr. KK Gupta conducted postmortem of deceased and the body of deceased was handed over to his father Nannulal. Thereafter, police recorded the statements of witnesses and prepared spot map. The accused were arrested and on the basis of memorandum an axe was seized from the house of accused Veer Singh. After due deliberations and completion of investigation, a charge sheet was filed before the competent Court of Criminal jurisdicti
Amrik Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab
Ashokkumar Magabhai Vankar vs. State of Gujarat
Asoke Basak vs. State of Maharashtra
Barendra Kumar Ghosh vs. King Emperor
Bavisetti Kameswara Rao vs. State of A.P.
Brathi vs. State of Punjab 1991 (1) SCC 519
Chhota Ahirwar vs. State of M.P.
Dharnidhar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dhirajbhai Gorakhbhai Nayak vs. State of Gujarat
Gopi Nath @ Jhallar vs. State of U.P. (2001) 6 SCC 620)
Krishnan & Another vs. State of Kerala (1996) 10 SCC 508)
Mahesh Balmiki vs. State of M.P.
Nand Kishore vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2011) 12 SCC 120)
Pulicherla Nagaraju @ Nagaraja vs. State of AP
Rambilas Singh & Ors. vs. State of Bihar (1989) 3 SCC 605
Ramesh Singh @ Photti vs. State of A.P. (2004) 11 SCC 305
Shyamal Ghosh vs. State of West Bengal (2012) 7 SCC 646)
State of Karnataka Vedanayagam (1995) 1 SCC 326 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 231)
State of Rajasthan vs. Kanhaiyalal
Surendra Chauhan vs. State of M.P. (2000) 4 SCC 110)
Suresh v State of U.P. (2001) 3 SCC 673
Vedanayagam case (1995) 1 SCC 326 : 1995 SCC (Cri) 231
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Ashok Kumar Jain For the Respondent : R. K. Awasthi
The court clarified that common intention under Section 34 can arise spontaneously during the commission of an act, and upheld the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on th....
(1) Common intention – An act would mean and include other acts along with it – Section 34 IPC creates a deeming fiction by infusing and importing a criminal act constituting an offence committed by ....
The court modified convictions from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the need for established common intention among accused, reflecting principles of reasonable doubt....
The court reaffirmed that the intention to kill can be established through circumstantial evidence and that joint liability under Section 34 IPC applies when multiple individuals participate in a cri....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.