SANDEEP V. MARNE
Hemant Bharat Kachare – Appellant
Versus
Vasu Anna Shetty – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) Petitioner has filed this petition challenging the judgment and decree dated 16 February 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Pune allowing Civil Appeal No.564/1996 and setting aside the eviction decree dated 30 March 1996 passed by the 3rd Additional Small Causes Court, Pune. The Appellate Court has dismissed Civil Suit No.253/1994 filed by Petitioner-Plaintiff seeking recovery of possession of the suit premises. Petitioner-landlord has accordingly filed the present petition challenging the decree passed by the Appellate Court on 16 February 1999.
2) Facts of the case, in brief, are that Plaintiff has inherited house property bearing CTS No.39/1 on Karve Road, Pune. Premises comprising a hall, tin shed adjoining the hall, kitchen and front open space totally admeasuring 1280 sq. ft. are the suit premises in which Defendant was inducted as a tenant under the Rent Agreement dated 1 April 1982. After his induction in the suit premises, Defendant commenced restaurant business therein. According to Plaintiff, Defendant started making permanent changes, alterations and erecting permanent structures in the suit premises. The Municipal Corporation therefore issued not
Permanent alterations made by a tenant without landlord consent constitute grounds for eviction under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act.
Unauthorized alterations became permanent constructions without landlord consent, justifying eviction under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act.
A landlord cannot seek eviction on arrears of rent if the statutory notice has not followed the deadline provision while unauthorized constructions can justify eviction if they are proven to cause de....
Eviction under Rent Act requires definitive evidence of permanent structures, including their nature and impact, which was insufficiently established in this case.
Alterations made without permission by a tenant constitute grounds for eviction under sections 13(1)(a) and 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act, invalidating contrary findings of the appellate court.
The judgment establishes that the erection of permanent structures by a tenant without the landlord's consent, in violation of Section 16(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, can lead to ....
Important Point : The court upheld the eviction decree based on unlawful subletting and unauthorized structural alterations, interpreting lease provisions to restrict successive subletting without la....
Revisional jurisdiction permits interference with perverse appellate findings ignoring tenant's admissions of unauthorized substantial alterations, spouse's suitable residence acquisition, and subjec....
Material alterations affecting rented property must permanently diminish value from the landlord's perspective to qualify for eviction under relevant law.
Tenant's unauthorized construction on adjoining land caused nuisance, justifying eviction under tenant protection laws, while landlord retains rights as adjoining occupier despite not residing nearby....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.