Back
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Impex (India) Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dinashah Jal Daruwala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. unauthorized occupation leads to landlord's right to eviction. (Para 1 , 2 , 6) |
| 2. nuisance causing actions can justify eviction claims. (Para 17 , 22 , 33) |
| 3. court confirms eviction based on tenant misconduct. (Para 44 , 45 , 99) |
| 4. nuisance defined broadly engenders stronger eviction grounds. (Para 56 , 64) |
| 5. occupancy interpretations within the context of statutory requirements. (Para 66 , 68) |
A. The Challenge
1. Petitioner-tenant has filed this petition challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 23 January 2004 passed in Civil Appeal No. 624 of 2001, by which the District Court has dismissed its Appeal and has confirmed the Decree dated 13 June 2001 passed by the Small Causes Judge, Pune in Civil Suit No. 490 of 1998. The Small Causes Court had allowed the suit filed by original Plaintiffs and directed Petitioner to handover vacant possession of the suit premises to them.
B. Facts
2. Facts of the case, as pleaded in the Plaint, are as follows. Original Plaintiffs owned a plot of land bearing Municipal House No. 108 in Koregaon Park, Pune on which, a bungalow known as 'Gardenia' is constructed, in addition to few other structures like outhouses and a garage. By Agree
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
