A. S. GADKARI, NEELA GOKHALE
Vinisha Sawant – Appellant
Versus
Mahendra Sawant – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Neela Gokhale, J.
1. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR dated 2nd January 2023 bearing No. 1 of 2023 registered with the CBD Belapur Police Station, Navi Mumbai for offences punishable under Sections 379, 406, 409, 420, 465, 467, 497, 500 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’).
2. The Petition was admitted by Order dated 6th September 2023 and the Police were restrained from filing charge sheet in the matter during the pendency of the present petition.
Respondent No.1 is duly served. Despite service, none appeared for Respondent No.1 when taken up for hearing.
3. Brief facts of the case are as follows :
3.1. The Petitioner is wife of the Respondent No.1. Respondent No.1 filed a complaint before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vashi bearing M.A No. 469/2021 praying for registration of FIR against the Petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 406, 420, 465, 497, 500 and 504 read with Section 34 of the IPC. Alternatively, the Respondent No.1 sought issuance of process under Section 204 of the Cr. P. C against the Petitioner and secure her presence to face charges under the aforesaid offence.
3.2. The learned Magistrate vide its Order dated 22nd November
Ramdev Food Products Private Limited v. State of Gujarat (2015) 6 SCC 439
Manharibhai Muljibhai Kakadia & Anr. v. Shaileshbhai Mohanbhai Patel & Ors. (2012) 10 SCC 517
Madhao and Another v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (2013) 5 SCC 615
Rameshbhai Pandurao Hedau v. State of Gujarat (2010) 4 SCC 185
Devarapalli Lakshminarayana Reddy and Others v. V. Narayana Reddy and Others (1976) 3 SCC 252
Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another (2019) 17 SCC 1
A Magistrate cannot revert to the pre-cognizance stage after taking cognizance of a complaint, making the order to register an FIR legally untenable.
The court ruled that a Magistrate must exercise careful judicial discretion when considering an application under Section 156(3), ensuring each complaint is evaluated adequately before deciding on FI....
The Magistrate must judiciously exercise discretion in registering FIRs under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., ensuring that mechanical refusals are avoided when cognizable offences are disclosed.
Direction for Police Investigation – Option to direct registration of case and its investigation by police should be exercised where some “investigation” is required, which is of a nature that is not....
A Magistrate can direct FIR registration even after commencing proceedings under section 202 Cr.P.C, clarifying the powers under sections 156(3) and 202.
A Magistrate has discretion under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. to either take cognizance or direct investigation by police, thus not legally bound to register an FIR.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.