SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Mukesh Kharwar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Kailash Pati Singh Yadav, Advocate
For the Opp. Parties: G.A

JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Kailash Pati Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr. D.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 08.05.2024 passed by Special Judge SC/ST Act Chandauli in Criminal Misc. Case No.78 of 2024 (Mukesh Kharwar vs. Arun Kumar and Others), Police Station- Baluwa, District- Chandauli as well as stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case, pending in the court of Special Judge SC/ST Act Chandauli.

3. Considering the nature of the order under challenge as well as order proposed to be passed, as purely equal question is involved, no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this matter pending, therefore, the matter is being decided at this stage without calling for counter affidavit.

4. Brief facts of the case are that an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. was moved by the applicant with the allegations that the applicant is an elected Member of Kshetra Panchayat, Kshetra Sankhya 83, Kshetra Papaura Vikas Khand Chahaniya, District- Chandauli. On 04.03.2024, the applicant along with 6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top