SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S. M. MODAK
Balaso Bhimgonda Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr.D.B.Patil
For the Respondent: Mr.P.G.Sawant, Mr.Anand S. Patil

JUDGMENT :

S. M. Modak, J.

1. The only issue arisen in this Writ Petition is “whether the trial Court was justified in sending unregistered Partition Deed to the Collector of Stamps for payment of requisite stamp and penalty”.

2. This issue arose during the trial of Regular Civil Suit No.105 of 2014 pending in the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division–Gadhinglaj, Kolhapur. It was a Suit for Partition filed by the present Respondent Nos.2 and 3 along with others. Whereas, present Petitioner is Defendant No.1. It was a Suit for Partition and declaration about sale- deed dated 11th February 2003 being not binding on the Plaintiff. The Suit property is as follows:-

    (a) Two (2) lands described in Para No.1(A) of the Plaint.

    (b) Five (5) R.C.C., shops and one (1) tin shade constructed on that land.

3. Present Petitioner refuted the averments in the Plaint and he has pleaded about Partition of the Suit land already taken place and recorded in the unregistered document dated 18th January 2013 titled as “Noting of partition by way of family arrangement”. He claims, as per the said arrangement, two Suits lands were allotted to his exclusive ownership. It is pertinent to note that the said agreemen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top