SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 364

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Parvath Shetty - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.5312 OF 2024
Decided On : 21-02-2025

Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Vishal Kanade with Mr. Bhavesh Magam, Advocates for the Petitioner in
WP No.5111 of 2024.
Mr. Sagar G. Talekar, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No.5312 of 2024.
Mr. Sharan Jagtiani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Dwakadas, Mr.
Siddharth Joshi, Mr. Nitesh Ranavat, Mr. Akshit Dedhia and Mr. Minhas
Joshi i/by M/s Wadia Gandy , Advocates for the Respondent No.4.
Ms. S. A. Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent/State in WP No.5312 of 2024.
Mr. Tanu Bhatia, AGP for the Respondent/State in WP No.5111 of 2024.

The court affirmed that only flat owners can manage a co-operative housing society, and the Deputy Registrar acted within jurisdiction under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Headnote:

(A) Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Section 78A - Removal of managing committee members - Petitioners challenged removal orders citing lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice - The Deputy Registrar's orders were upheld by the Divisional Joint Registrar and the Hon’ble Minister, citing non-approval of membership by MHADA as grounds for removal - The court found that the Deputy Registrar acted within jurisdiction, emphasizing that only flat owners should manage society affairs. (Paras 1, 6, 16, 24, 42)

(B) Jurisdictional Error - The court ruled that the Deputy Registrar cannot question membership validity while removing members from the managing committee under Section 78A, as this is a separate issue under Section 154B-9. (Paras 25, 41)

(C) Natural Justice - The court noted that the Petitioners were not served with show cause notices, but upheld the removal due to the lack of ownership of flats in the society. (Paras 7, 42)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were removed from the managing committee of a co-operative housing society for not having MHADA approval for their membership and for not owning flats in the society. They contested the removal, arguing jurisdictional errors and violations of natural justice.

Findings of Court:
The court upheld the removal, stating that the Deputy Registrar acted within jurisdiction and that only flat owners should manage the society.

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the Petitioners' membership and the jurisdiction of the Deputy Registrar in removing them from the managing committee.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Deputy Registrar's actions were justified under Section 78A, and the validity of membership is a separate issue that should be addressed independently.

Result: Both writ petitions are dismissed with no order as to costs.

JUDGMENT :

1. Petitioners have filed these petitions challenging the orders dated 13th January 2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies removing them from the post of managing committee members and disqualifying them from being managing committee members for the next one term and appointing authorized officer to look after day-to-day affairs of the society under provisions of Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act). Appeal preferred by Petitioners before Divisional Joint Registrar has been rejected by order dated 2nd May 2023. Further Revision preferred by the Petitioners before the Hon’ble Minister Co-operation is also rejected by order dated 1st March 2024. Accordingly, orders passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar and the Hon’ble Minister are also subject matter of challenge in the present petitions.

2. An open plot of land admeasuring 462.36 sq. meters situated at Survey No.287A, CTS No.3A(Pt.) was allotted by Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) in favour of Mr. Harbux Mulchand Chuggani on 23rd May 1962 and a formal Deed of Lease came to be executed in his favour on 6th October 1993 for a period of 99 years. Said Mr. Chuggani accordingly constructed a building comprising of ground plus two upper floors and sold the flats therein to Saparna Hingorani, Mukesh Gandhi and Kishore Gandhi/Lalita Gandhi. It is Petitioners’ case that said Mr. Harbux Chuggani contacted one Mr. Deepak Shetty for redevelopment of the building so as to utilize balance FSI potential available on the leased plot. Said Mr. Depak Shetty became a Chief Promoter and formed and registered JVPD Sterling Co-operative Housing Society Limited by taking on board 10 outsiders as members of the society. The names of the said 11 persons shown to have been the original members of the society are as under:

1. Deepak R. Shetty

2. H. M. Chuggani

3. Swarup S. Khedekar

4. Ratnakar S. Shetty

5. Janki Shetty

6. Jyothi H. Shetty

7. Yogesh R. Shetty

8. Vinith N. Shetty

9. Anupama Y. Shetty

10. Ajay Kanuga

11. Nandu N. Shetty

3. The society was registered on 27th April, 2004 a tripartite Deed of Assignment was executed between Mr. Harbux Chuggani, Society and MHADA by which the lease in respect of the plot was apparently transferred in the name of the society. On 28th December 2006 a Development Agreement was executed and registered by the society with M/s Kamla Landmarc Builders (Kamla Landmarc) for redevelopment of the land and the building. The Development Agreement envisaged allotment of flat in the reconstructed building to the original three owners of flats Saparna Hingorani, Kishore/Lalita Gandhi and Mukesh/Harsha Gandhi whose names were included in the Annexure-A to the Development Agreement. A separate Annexure-C was attached to the agreement which included names of eleven members of the society and it was agreed that the Developer shall sell the flats constructed in the new building to the said persons whose names were included in Annexure-C at 20% less costs than the prevailing market rates. It appears that MHADA permitted addition of Prashant Hingorani, Kishore D. Gandhi and Jay Gandhi as members of the society by letter dated 23rd July, 2007. According to Petitioners, MHADA granted permission for construction of building comprising of seven floors in which three flats were to be allotted to the original occupants Prashant Hingorani, Jay Gandhi and Kishore Gandhi and rest of the flats were to be distributed according to the Petitioners to eleven members of the society. The Chief Promoter Mr. Deepak Shetty passed away on 7th April 2008. It appears that the original members are shown to have transferred their membership in the society in favour of Petitioners during the years 2007-08. Thus, except Ratnakar Shetty, Yogesh Shetty and Nandu Shetty, rest of the eight members transferred their membership in favour of incoming members during 2004 to 2010. Petitioners are some of such new-coming members and cla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top