IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KAMAL KHATA
Urvinder Singh Pal – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Registrar Co-operative – Respondent
Judgment :
KAMAL KHATA, J.
1. By this Writ Petition, the Petitioners challenge:
(i) The Order dated 3rd June 2025 passed by the Respondent No. 1 - Deputy Registrar Co-operative Societies (DRCS) (impugned order) - whereby the Petitioners were disqualified and barred from being re-elected, re-co-opted or re-nominated as members of any Committee until the expiry of one term; and
(ii) The Order dated 17th July 2025 passed by the Respondent No.18 (Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies (‘DJRCS’) rejecting ad-interim reliefs seeking stay of implementation of the impugned order.
The aforestated two orders are hereinafter referred to as the impugned orders for the sake of brevity.
2. Mr. Kamat learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioners submitted that the rejection of the ad-interim relief by the DJRCS effectively defeats the Petitioners’ rights by barring their participation in the election process of the managing committee.Thus, reliefs are sought by filing the Writ Petition.
3. Mr. Jagtiani learned Senior Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 to 17 raises a preliminary objection. He submitted that, the Petitioners have an efficacious alternative statutory remedy by way of Revision Applicati
Disqualification of committee members requires clear show cause notices, and alternative remedies must be exhausted before seeking writ relief, affirming the importance of natural justice in administ....
Legal action under S.78 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act must respect principles of natural justice, including the right to respond to specific charges.
Provisions of Section 76(B(2) would stand somewhat on different footing. This Court when is taking a view that action could be initiated under subsection (2) only after passing order of removal, issu....
The court affirmed that only flat owners can manage a co-operative housing society, and the Deputy Registrar acted within jurisdiction under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act,....
Government resolutions under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act are directory, not mandatory, and disqualification requires valid procedural compliance and adherence to principles of natural j....
Removal of a managing committee under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires clear evidence of misconduct and proper procedural compliance.
The court established that disqualification of elected members without a fair hearing violates principles of natural justice, necessitating a proper inquiry process before any punitive action can be ....
A cooperative society must provide specific allegations prior to expelling members, and any dismissal of membership without due process is unsustainable under the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act.
The court establishes that the removal of a co-opted member from a cooperative society must adhere to Rule 43-A, failing which any subsequent actions are void.
The Registrar must consider the reasonability of the excuse offered by the affected party before imposing disqualification or penalty under Section 75 (5) of the Act, 1960.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.