IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. S. GADKARI, KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
Bombay Slum Redevelopment Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Slum Rehabilitation Authority – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) By this Petition, the Petitioners seek the following reliefs:
“(a) In view of aforesaid reasoned grounds, the Petitioners submit that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction, calling upon the records and proceedings from the file of the Respondent No.2 and 7 and after going through the legality, propriety and validity of the Impugned notice dated 19/6/2019 (Exhibit ‘Z’ hereto) and any decision taken on 7th July 2019, be pleased to quash and/or set aside the same.
(b) The Petitioners submits that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ, order or directions against the Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8 to grant opportunity to Petitioners to complete the construction of redevelopment of suit property and set aside the order dated 25/1/2016 passed by Respondent No.2 and order dated 29/4/2017 passed by Respondent No.6.
(c) The Petitioners submit that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any writ, order or directions to Respondent No.1 & 2 and the Police Department to initiate enquiry against Respo
The court upheld the termination of the Petitioners' appointment as developers, affirming that proper procedures were followed and that the Petitioners lacked standing due to project delays.
The court upheld the AGRC's decision to terminate the developer's appointment due to delays in implementing the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, attributing responsibility to the developer for inaction po....
The court ruled that disputed questions of fact regarding land area and project delays are not suitable for Writ jurisdiction, emphasizing the need for timely completion of slum rehabilitation projec....
The court upheld the authority of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to issue eviction notices under the Slum Act, affirming that redevelopment of censused slums does not require separate notification....
The court upheld the validity of ongoing proceedings under Section 13(2) of the Act, affirming that the petitioner was afforded adequate opportunity to present its case and that the impugned decision....
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority can terminate a developer's appointment for inordinate delays in scheme implementation, emphasizing the developer's obligation to act proactively.
The court affirmed the authority of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to remove a developer for inordinate delay and non-compliance with statutory obligations under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, em....
slum-dwellers who belong to the weaker sections of the society are to be rehabilitated by providing them reasonable housing thereby protecting them from eviction and distress warrants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.