Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE
Priya Construction Company – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra, Through Department Of Housing – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANISH PITALE, J.
1. The petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ petition, alleging that the manner in which the impugned minutes of decisions dated 07.10.2024 and 15.07.2024, as also the order dated 11.10.2024, have been issued by the respondents, demonstrates that the respondent-State and statutory authorities have already taken a decision to terminate the appointment of the petitioner as developer for redevelopment of a particular piece and parcel of plot, rendering a proceeding pending under Section 13(2) of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), as a mere formality, thereby violating the valuable rights vested in the petitioner. It is alleged that respondent Nos.4 to 8 have acted in concert with the said statutory authorities i.e. respondent Nos.1 to 3, to illegally benefit respondent No.9, the developer, who is sought to be brought in by the said respondents in a clandestine manner to take over the redevelopment project.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that initially, only the final minutes of decision dated 07.10.2024 were challenged in the present petition because of
The court upheld the validity of ongoing proceedings under Section 13(2) of the Act, affirming that the petitioner was afforded adequate opportunity to present its case and that the impugned decision....
The CEO/SRA has the authority to terminate a Developer under Section 13(2) of the Slum Act for delays and non-performance in the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, emphasizing timely completion for public b....
The court upheld the AGRC's decision to terminate the developer's appointment due to delays in implementing the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, attributing responsibility to the developer for inaction po....
The Slum Rehabilitation Authority can terminate a developer's appointment for inordinate delays in scheme implementation, emphasizing the developer's obligation to act proactively.
slum-dwellers who belong to the weaker sections of the society are to be rehabilitated by providing them reasonable housing thereby protecting them from eviction and distress warrants.
The court affirmed the authority of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to remove a developer for inordinate delay and non-compliance with statutory obligations under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, em....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
