Abhay Arun Daithankar vs Mousami W/o Abhay Daithankar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Bom) 411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J
Abhay Arun Daithankar – Appellant
Versus
Mousami W/o Abhay Daithankar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Dr. R.R. Deshpande h/f. Priyanka Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. Amol A. Kokad, Advocate for the Respondent No.1.

JUDGMENT :

[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]

1. At the outset it is submitted that considering the matrimonial dispute between the Petitioner and Respondent No.1, this Court has granted sufficient opportunities to both the sides for settlement of dispute between them despite of same, they have failed to settle the dispute. Irrespective of the the facts, this Court also intervened and gave understanding by mediating but both the parties declined to settle the dispute. Therefore, both the parties were called upon to argue the matter on merit.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of both sides, heard finally at the stage of admission.

3. Heard at length Mr. Deshpande, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Kokad, the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

4. By present petition, the Petitioner/Husband has questioned the legality and validity of orders dated 22.08.2024 passed below Exh.39 and Exh.46 by the learned Family Judge, Latur, in Petition No. E-239/2021. The present Petitioner is the Original Non-Applicant and present Respondent Nos.1 to 3 are the Original Applicants in proceeding bearing Petition No.E-239/2021, filed under Section 125 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document