IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
Ramkrishna S/o Maroti Bangar - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1028 of 2024
Decided On : 10-02-2025
(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) - Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Sections 109, 115(2), 318(4), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 61(2) - Anticipatory bail application - Rejection of bail application by Special Court challenged - Allegations of caste-based abuse and threats made against informant - Court found that allegations did not occur in public view, thus bar under Sections 18 and 18-A of the Atrocities Act not applicable - Investigating Officer's report indicated lack of evidence against accused. (Paras 14, 19, 20, 21)
(B) Anticipatory Bail - Principles governing grant of anticipatory bail under Atrocities Act - Court must assess whether allegations made are substantiated and whether incident occurred in public view. (Paras 14, 15, 19)
Facts of the case:
The informant alleged that he was abused and threatened by the accused based on his caste, and subsequently assaulted and set on fire. The accused sought anticipatory bail after their application was rejected by the Special Court.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the alleged abuse did not occur in public view, and the evidence presented was insufficient to substantiate the claims against the accused.
Issues: The main issues were whether the allegations constituted an offence under the Atrocities Act and whether the bar on anticipatory bail applied.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the allegations did not meet the criteria for public view as required under the Atrocities Act, thus allowing the anticipatory bail application.
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT :
[Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
1. Heard Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, the learned Senior counsel with Ms Rakshanda Rajan Jaiswal, instructed by Mr. Praful Bachate, the learned counsel for the Appellants, the learned APP for Respondent No.1 and Mr. R. N. Dhorde, the learned Senior counsel instructed by Mr. V. R. Dhorde, along with Mr. S. S. Dudhane, Advocate for Respondent No.2 / victim-informant.
2. By the present Appeal, the Appellants/accused have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 read with Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and take exception to the order dated 19.11.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, (Atrocities), Beed, Below Exh.1 in Criminal Bail Application No.1237 of 2024, whereby the prayer for pre-arrest bail was declined in Crime No. 0394 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 318(4), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2) (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. In a nutshell, it is the prosecution’s case that, on 11.11.2024, Respondent No.2/informant lodged an oral report with Police Station (Rural), Beed alleging that, from the year 2005 till 2008, he was residing in Hutatma Deorao Magasvargiya Hostel, Bhayala, run by Shri Ramkrishna Bangar, Appellant No.1. He knows the appellant accused No.2 Vijaysingh @ Bala Ramkrishna Bangar and Smt. Satyabhamabai w/o Ramkrishna Bangar, appellant/accused No.3. He belongs to Scheduled Castes community. In the year 2012, the accused No. 1 appointed him on temporary basis on the post of Laboratory Assistant with Adarsh Kanishth Mahavidyalaya, Khalapuri. At that time, he met accused No.1 Ramkrishna Bangar. Respondent No.2 informant further alleged that, in the year 2018, accused No.1 to 3 obtained Rs.4,00,000/- from him, but, subsequently tortured him by raising an additional demand of Rs.6,00,000/- and issued threats that if he fail to pay the said amount, he would be removed from his job. It is further alleged that, the accused Nos. 1 to 3 never paid him salary and whenever he asked for his salary, he was abused on the basis of his caste. The Appellant No.4 is the Headmaster of a school run by the accused Nos. 1 to 3.
4. On 10.11.2024 at about 9.00 a.m., he visited the house of accused No.1 to 3 in village Patoda and requested the Appellant no. 1 for refund of money of Rs.4,00,000/-, which was paid by him to secure the job in presence of accused No.3, Satyabhamabai Bangar and accused No.4 Aabasaheb Bhanudas Gopalghare. But accused No.1 Ramkrishna Bangar, abused him on the basis of his caste, saying

The court ruled that allegations of caste-based abuse must occur in public view to invoke the bar on anticipatory bail under the Atrocities Act, which was not established in this case.
Section 18 bar on anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act applies only where prima facie offence of caste-based humiliation in public view established; absent specific allegations against family members, b....
Section 18 bar on anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act inapplicable where FIR vaguely alleges caste abuse without specifics, revealing financial loan dispute; no custodial need if documents producible v....
Anticipatory bail – Bar under Section 18 and (2) of Section 18A of SC/St Act, 1989 will not apply if complaint does not make out a prima facie case for applicability of provisions of 1989 Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the authenticity and timing of allegations, specificity of the allegations, and presence of independent witnesses are crucial factors in deter....
Point of law : Even if the bare reading of the FIR/ complaint indicates that prima facie provisions of the Act are not found to be attracted, then harmonious construction of Section 438 of the Code o....
Bar will not apply where the complaint does not make out “a prima facie case” for the applicability of the provisions of the Act. A statutory exclusion of the right to access remedies for bail is con....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.