Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Vijay Shankar Patil – Appellant
Versus
UCO Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) Petitioners have filed this petition challenging the judgment and order dated 29 August 2024 passed by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Mumbai to the extent of denial of interest on the legal dues payable towards implementation of the Award dated 16 September 1999.
2) Two workmen-Vijay Shankar Patil and Dilip S. Kotharkar were working with the Respondent-Bank and were terminated from service. At their instance, Reference CGIT No.2/13 of 1999 relating to their demand for reinstatement was registered with Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Mumbai (CGIT). The Reference was answered by the CGIT in favour of the workmen by setting aside their termination and directing their reinstatement with full backwages w.e.f. 29 May 1997 alongwith continuity of service. The Bank filed Writ Petition No.4510/2000 in this Court challenging the Award dated 16 September 1999. The Petition came to be dismissed by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 30 August 2000. The Bank filed Letters Patent Appeal challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated 30 August 2000, which was registered as LPA No.37/2013. The Appeal Court dismissed the App
The Labour Court can award interest on delayed payments under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, emphasizing that such interest is compensatory for delays in implementing awards.
Employees are entitled to claim interest on delayed payment of overtime wages under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, if the delay is not their fault and the cause of action arose....
The Labour Court lacks the authority to award interest in proceedings under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as such provisions are not included in the statutory framework governi....
Award of wages for intervening period – Merely because there was interim order/stay of order of reinstatement during pendency of proceedings, employee-appellant cannot be denied back wages/wages when....
The limitation provided for in it is for requesting appropriate government for issuance of recovery certificate, as provided in sub-section (1) of Section 33C of ‘the Act’ and present proceeding is n....
The general rule is that the workman is entitled to the benefits under Section 17B from the date of passing of the award unless there is undue delay on the part of the workman in approaching the Cour....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
