IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BHARATI DANGRE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ
Kinjal Vilas Bastav - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.40 OF 2025
Decided On : 26-02-2025
(A) Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 - Section 8 - Petitioners' claim for Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe Certificate invalidated by Respondent No.2 - Court found that Petitioners established their lineage through valid Caste Validity Certificates of blood relatives - Respondent No.2's reliance on unrelated invalidations was erroneous. (Paras 3, 11, 16)
(B) Burden of proof - The burden of proving that a person belongs to a particular caste or tribe lies with the claimant as per Section 8 of the Act - Petitioners discharged this burden by providing valid documentation. (Paras 11, 13)
Facts of the case:
The Petitioners, related to individuals with valid Caste Validity Certificates, sought recognition as belonging to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. Their claims were previously validated by the Court, but were invalidated by Respondent No.2 based on unrelated claims. (Paras 3, 4)
Findings of Court:
The Court found that the Respondent No.2's invalidation of the Petitioners' claims was unsustainable and directed the issuance of the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe Certificate. (Paras 16, 17)
Issues: Whether the Petitioners could establish their claim to belong to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe based on their lineage and existing Caste Validity Certificates. (Para 7)
Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the Respondent No.2 failed to consider the valid Caste Validity Certificates of the Petitioners' blood relatives and erroneously relied on unrelated invalidations. (Paras 16)
Result: The impugned order is quashed; Respondent No.2 is directed to issue the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe Certificate to the Petitioners within 30 days.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' application for verification (Para 4) |
| 2. petitioners' counsel arguments (Para 5) |
| 3. respondent's opposition (Para 6) |
| 4. determination of petitioners' claims (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's reasoning on validity (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. court's directive to respondent (Para 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
1. Rule. By consent of the respective counsels representing the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith. Petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. Respondent No.2, by its Common Order dated 23.10.2024 has invalidated the claim of the Petitioners as belonging to ‘Koli Mahadev’ Scheduled Tribe Category (“Impugned Order”).
3. Factual Matrix:
(a) This is a composite petition, at the instance of the following Petitioners viz.:
(i) Kinjal Bastav- Daughter of Vilas Bastav;
(ii) Manav Bastav- Son of Mukesh Bastav; and
(iii) Aayush Bastav- Son of Prashant Bastav.
Petitioner No.1 is the first cousin sister of Petitioner Nos.2 and 3. Similarly, Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the first cousin brothers of Petitioner No.1.
(b) Tribe claim of Ms. Yaminee Pandurang Bastav, i.e. paternal real Aunt of the Petitioners as belonging to Mahadeo Koli was the subject matter of Writ Petition No. 1434 of 1994. By order dated 24.03.1994, this Court declared Yaminee Pandurang Bastav as belonging to Scheduled Tribe Mahadeo Koli.
(c) Tribe claim of Mr. Yatin Nilkanth Bastav, the paternal cousin uncle of the Petitioners, as belonging to Mahadev Koli was subject matter of Writ Petition No.8033 of 2004. By order dated 04.10.2013, this Court relying on the Caste Validity Certificate granted to Yaminee Pandurang Bastav, directed the Respondent No.2 to consider the tribe claim of Yatin Nilkanth Bastav. Respondent No.2 on consideration of the tribe claim of Yatin Nilkanth Bastav issued Caste Validity Certificate as belonging to Koli Mahadev.
(d) Tribe claim of Pramod Govind Bastav, i.e, paternal cousin grandfather of the Petitioners as belonging to Mahadev Koli was subject matter of Writ Petition No.2925 of 2013. By order dated 04.10.2013, this Court directed the Respondent No.2 to consider the tribe claim of Pramod Govind Bastav. Respondent No.2 on consideration of the tribe claim of Pramod Govind Bastav, issued Caste Validity Certificate as belonging to Mahadev Koli.
(e) Special Leave Petition (Diary) No.21767 of 2017 filed against the order dated 04.10.2013 passed in Writ Petition No.8033 of 2004 and Writ Petition No.2925 of 2013 was dismissed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court on 18.09.2017.
(f) Tribe claims of the father of Petitioner No.1 and father of Petitioner No.2 upon being invalidated by the Respondent No.2, was questioned before this Court in Writ Petition No.3134 of 2009.
This Court relying on the Caste Validity Certificate issued to Yaminee Bastav, Yatin Bastav and Pramod Bastav, the close blood relations from paternal side, directed the Respondent No.2 to issue Caste Validity Certificate to Vilas Pandurang Bastav and Mukesh Pandurang Bastav as belonging to Koli Mahadev Schedule Tribe. Respondent No.2 accordingly issued Certificate of Validity to Vilas and Mukesh as belonging to Koli Mahadev.
(g) Petitioners have been issued Scheduled Tribe Certificate in Form C by the Sub Divisional Office, Eastern Suburbs, Mumbai Suburban District.
(h) In the month of April 2024, Petitioners applied to the Respondent No.2 in the prescribed manner for verification of their Tribe Certificate as belonging to Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe. Affidavit in Form “F” containing the complete Genealogy Tree was appended to the application.
(i) Application Form of Petitioner No.3 was accepted by the Respondent No.2 pursuant to the direction issued by this Court vide order dated 12.11.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.9464 of 2024.
(j) Enquiry Report dated 12.11.2024 of the Vigilance Cell was furnished to the Petitioner Nos.1 and 2. Petitioners filed their reply to the Enquiry Report dated 12.11.2024.
(k) Petitioner No.1 had filed Writ Petition No.14956 of 2

The burden of proof for caste claims lies with the claimant, and valid lineage documentation must be considered in determining eligibility for caste certificates.
The burden of proof for claiming Scheduled Tribe status lies with the claimant, and valid certificates of relatives can substantiate such claims.
Caste validity certificates for Scheduled Tribes must consider familial ties; invalidation of relatives' certificates affects related claims.
The importance of pre-independence documents and the validation of tribe certificates for blood relatives unless obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.
Point of Law : Once there is evidence of relatives having valid caste validity certificates of Thakur Scheduled Tribe, the Scrutiny Committee is bound to grant certificate to Petitioner’s claim and c....
The withdrawal of benefits secured on the basis of false caste claims is a necessary consequence of the invalidation of the caste claim.
Caste claims must be evaluated with pre-constitutional documents holding greater evidential value, and reliance on affinity tests, which do not definitively establish caste ties, is insufficient for ....
The probative value of pre-constitutional documents showing the caste of the applicant and their ancestors, the requirement for the Scrutiny Committee to record brief reasons before referring a case ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.