IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. Gadkari, Kamal Khata, JJ.
Sunil Laxman Dond and ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The Commissioner, Nashik Municipal Corporation and ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No.9318 of 2023
Pronounced On : 08-04-2025
(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Section 127(2) - Writ Petition for declaration of lapsing of land reservation - Petitioners sought release of land from reservation for public purpose after statutory period expired without acquisition - Court held that failure to acquire land within statutory period leads to lapsing of reservation. (Paras 3, 9, 10, 12, 15)
(B) Land Acquisition - Statutory requirements - The court emphasized that the statutory right accrued to landowners cannot be negated by fresh reservations in development plans. (Paras 12, 13)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners owned agricultural land reserved for public purposes under the development plan. They served a purchase notice due to non-acquisition for over a decade, claiming the reservation had lapsed. (Paras 4, 5)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the Respondents failed to take necessary steps for land acquisition, leading to the conclusion that the reservation had lapsed. (Paras 10, 11)
Issues: The main issues included whether the reservation had lapsed due to inaction by the Respondents and the validity of fresh reservations imposed. (Paras 9, 12)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Respondents' failure to act within the statutory period resulted in the lapsing of the reservation, affirming that fresh reservations cannot override accrued rights. (Paras 10, 12)
Result: Rule made absolute; State Government directed to notify lapsing of reservation within 6 weeks.
JUDGMENT :
Kamal Khata, J.
1) Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, the Petition is heard finally.
2) Heard Mr. Shrishailya Deshmukh for the Petitioners; Mr. M.L. Patil for Respondent No.1 and Ms. M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Perused entire record produced before us.
3) By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioners seek a declaration that, their land bearing Survey No.7A (part) Hissa No. 4A, village Chehedi Budruk (writ land) situated within the jurisdiction of Nashik Municipal Corporation (‘NMC’) be released from reservation in the final development plan. Additionally, they seek a declaration that the fresh reservation No.473 and 474 upon the writ land that is notified on 9th January 2017 is illegal in view of the purchase notice duly served on 3rd March 2014, and a direction to the State Government to issue a notification, in terms of Section 127 (2) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (‘MRTP Act’) within a period of 3 months, to declare lapsing of reservation on the writ land and to permit the Petitioners to develop their land in accordance with law.
BRIEF FACTS:
4) The Petitioners are residents of Nasik and are the owners of agricultural land bearing Survey No.7/A/4/A admeasuring around 78 gunthas situated at village Chehedi Budruk, within the jurisdiction of Nasik Municipal Corporation (NMC). The development plan for Nasik City was sanctioned by the Urban Development Department in 4 parts and published on 28th June 1993, 19th August 1994, 15th May 1995 and 19th February 1996 respectively. The Petitioner’s land measuring 16,000 sq. mtrs. is shown as reserved for public purpose, namely “High School and Primary School” having reservation No.143. The Petitioners sent the purchase Notice on 3rd March 2014 under Section 127 of the MRTP Act to the Respondents on the failure of NMC to acquire the land for more than two decades (statute mandates 10 years). The Assistant Director of Town Planning (‘ADTP’) of NMC acknowledged the receipt of the Notice served by the Petitioners and called upon them to submit documents showing their ownership to the property, map of the property and other documents including measurement sheet issued by the Superintendent of Land Records. The letter also mentioned that, if the Petitioners were ready to hand over the area under reservation to the Corporation then they would be entitled to TDR and for that the agreement will be executed. By the letter dated 11th April 2014, the Petitioners informed the Estate Officer of NMC that, they were not agreeable to accept TDR as compensation for their reserved land.
5) Upon the expiry of the statutory period of 12 months from the service of purchase Notice, on 3rd March 2015 the Petitioners informed the Respondents that, the reservation upon the land had lapsed and they were entitled to develop their land in accordance with law. In response to the Petitioners letter dated 3rd March 2015 the NMC through the Estate Officer on 10th April 2015, addressed a letter stating that, the proposal for land acquisition in respect of the Petitioners land is submitted to the Office of the Collector on 22nd December 2014 and was pending decision. Later, on 27th May 2015, the ADTP, Nashik by his letter informed the Petitioners that the Petitioners proposal as per their intimation letter dated 3rd March 2015 for land acquisition is rejected by the Collector, Nashik. The Petitioners were informed that, the land acquisition proposal, submitted by the NMC for acquisition of the Petitioners’ land was sent back on 17th April 2015 to the NMC for compliance. The Petitioners once again addressed reminders to the NMC and the other Respondents on 25th March 2015, 21st April 2023 and 23rd May 2023 intimating them that, since no steps were taken pursuant to the purchase Notice issued by them under Section 127, the reservation had lapsed and demanded the land be released. These letters demanded issuance of necessa
Girnar Traders V/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited vs State of Maharashtra
Failure to acquire land within the statutory period leads to lapsing of reservation, and fresh reservations cannot negate accrued rights of landowners.
The court established that under Section 127 of the MRTP Act, failure to initiate acquisition steps within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of land reservation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation on the land would lapse if the Planning Authority failed to take steps within the specified period, and acquisition would only....
Reservation in development plan lapses automatically under Section 127 MRTP Act upon notice if land not acquired within 10 years; no court declaration required; authorities must notify lapse promptly....
The failure of the authority to acquire land within the statutory period results in the lapse of reservation, allowing the landowner to develop the property.
Failure of authorities to act on statutory notice for land acquisition leads to lapsing of reservation under the M.R.T.P. Act.
The reservation of land and acquisition proceedings can lapse if the prescribed period from service of the purchase notice under section 127 of the MRTP Act expires without the necessary steps being ....
Failure to acquire land within stipulated time under MRTP results in automatic lapse of reservation, protecting owner's rights.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.