SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1112

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
SANKALP RAMDAS GADEKAR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicants have approached this Court apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 406/2024, registered with Sadar Bajar Police Station, Jalna, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3] The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have deposited the amount of Rs.16,00,000/- on 22.08.2024 and Rs.17,00,000/- 25.11.2024 in this Court. He has no objections if the amount is given to the informant. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this Court, by order dated 15th July, 2024, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicants and they have attended the concerned police station and have cooperated with the investigation.

4] The learned counsel for the parties submits that the parties have compromised the matter and applied for quashing of the FIR.

5] Criminal Application No.4918 of 2024 is filed by the informant, seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited in this Court. The applicants–accused in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 880 of 2024 have no objection for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top