Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH
ROHIT W. JOSHI
Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Dnyaneshwar Sadashiv Nagpure – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The land of the Cross-objector bearing Gat No. 38 admeasuring 3.95 HR located at village Ridhora, Tahsil and District Nagpur came to be acquired for Wadgaon Dam under Lower Vena Project. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) was published in the Official Gazette on 27/4/1995, which is last date of publication. The Land Acquisition Officer has passed Award dated 30/4/1997 under Section 11 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Officer has awarded compensation of Rs.1,78,186/- for the land, Rs.47,985/- for pipe-line, Rs.6039/- for a structure standing on the land and Rs. 4,86,316/- for the trees. It will be pertinent to mention here that there were 375 orange trees in a portion admeasuring 1.22 HR land acquired from the Cross-objector.
2. As stated above, the Land Acquisition Officer passed Award dated 30/4/1997. The Cross-objector made an application seeking reference under Section 18 of the Act, since he was not satisfied with the amount of compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. Accordingly, reference was made to the Civil Court, which came to be registered as Land Acquisition Case No. 154 of 2005.
3. The Cross-ob
Compensation for land and trees under the Land Acquisition Act must be based on reliable evidence, and when determined by income capitalization method, it includes both land and trees, prohibiting se....
Compensation for land and trees cannot be awarded separately when determined by income capitalization method, as it includes both values.
Compensation for land and trees cannot be awarded separately when determined by income capitalization method; it constitutes a composite valuation.
Compensation for land and trees in land acquisition cases must be determined by income capitalization method, which includes both, and separate compensation is not permissible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the income capitalization method and specific valuation methods for determining compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 189....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of just, fair, and reasonable compensation for acquired land and fruit-bearing trees under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
In a case where land value has been determined with reference to sales statistics, trees will have to be valued separately.
The court established that compensation for acquired land and trees must be based on fair market value and supported by credible evidence, with a clear obligation to adhere to established legal prece....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
