IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR CHANDRABHAN MORE
Reliance General Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Tejas Ravikran Zol – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant Insurance Company, who is original respondent No.3 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.232/2012, has challenged the judgment and award dated 07.04.2017 passed in the aforesaid claim petition by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Tribunal"), on the only ground that whether major son and daughter, who are not dependent on the income of deceased, can claim compensation on the ground of loss of dependency.
2. It is not disputed that one Sharubala Ravikiran Zol died in an accident which took place on 09.02.2012 when she was going from Dondaicha by-pass road alongwith her husband. It is also not in dispute that initially the motor accident claim petition in respect of deceased Sharubala was filed by her husband Ravikiran and son Tejas. However, during pendency of the claim petition, the husband of deceased died, and therefore, the claim petition was prosecuted by Tejas and Urjja, who are respectively son anddaughter of the deceased. It is to be noted here that the learned tribunal awarded total amount of compensation of Rs.42,27,824/- inclusive of the award under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act on the pri
Major married and earning children of a deceased have the right to claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, irrespective of their dependency status.
Legal representatives of a deceased have a right to claim compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, regardless of financial dependency, as established by precedents.
Major children can claim compensation as dependents of a deceased parent, regardless of their financial independence.
Where claimants are non-dependent brothers/sisters claiming loss of estate, savings can be taken as 15% of the income and such savings then multiplied to compute the total loss of estate of the claim....
Legal representatives can claim compensation under the Motor Vehicle Act regardless of dependency, emphasizing a broad interpretation of 'legal representative' to ensure justice.
It is settled that legal representatives of deceased have a right to apply for compensation.
Legal representatives can maintain compensation claims for deceased relatives regardless of their dependency, but the extent of dependency influences the quantum of compensation assessed.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that even major and earning legal representatives of the deceased are entitled to claim compensation under the head of loss of dependency, as inter....
Legal representatives, including major children, are entitled to claim compensation regardless of dependency; the Tribunal erred in limiting the compensation amount based on dependency status.
The intent behind the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act is to provide succor to the persons who are dependent upon the deceased victim.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.