SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 81

M. A. CHOWDHARY
Jamal Din – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: G.S. Thakur.
For Respondents: Amrit Sarin.

JUDGMENT :

1. Since a common question of law in both the above titled appeals arises from the two awards dated 29.12.2016 passed by a common judgment by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ramban (for short the Tribunal) in two separate claim petitions filed by the appellants/claimants, the same are proposed to be disposed of by this common judgment.

2. In a vehicular accident involving the offending vehicle bearing Registration No. JK19-0772, at Karol Ramban while on its way from Jammu to Gool on 19.10.2011 at 12:30 P.M. due to alleged rash and negligent driving of its driver, as a result of which two passengers Zeba Begum and Shahmal Begum got seriously injured and died. The legal heirs of both the deceased filed two separate claim petitions seeking compensation for the death of the deceased in terms of the Motor Vehicle Act.

3. The Tribunal after full dressed trial of both the claim petitions decided both the petitions vide judgment/award dated 29.12.2016 (hereinafter called 'the impugned award') whereby in case titled “Jamal Din & Ors. v. New India Assurance Company Limited & Ors.”, a

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top