SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1946 Supreme(Bom) 1

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Daulatrao Malojirao – Appellant
Versus
Province of Bombay – Respondent


JUDGMENT

       Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.

On March 17, 1944, judgment was delivered in this appeal by my brother Divatia and myself, by which we held, that as the plaintiff's claim is advanced and rests upon a saranjam tenure, Section 4 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act of 1876 is a bar to any relief being granted to the plaintiff against Government relating to the suit lands, in so far as they are classified to be granted or held as saranjam. At the same time, we pointed out, that the appeal raised a very important question so far as the general body of the saranjamdars is concerned and we intimated that Government might desire to have it judicially determined by making a reference u/s 12 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act. Accordingly, before passing any order, we gave an opportunity for a reference to be made, and it is such reference which is now before this full bench. The facts sufficiently appear from the judgments delivered on March 17, 1944, and arising out of what was then said Government have referred to us the following questions:-

       (1) Whether on February 25, 1936, being the date of the sub-divisional grant of the Gajendragad estate, the saranjam tenure in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top