IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
REVATI MOHITE DERE, NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
Swasthishri Jinsen Bhattarak, Pattacharya Mahaswami Sanstha, Math (Karveer) Kolhapur - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
Writ Petition No.4965 of 2025 With Interim Application (ST) No.21808 of 2025, Interim Application No.7765 of 2025
Decided on : 16-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rule made returnable; petition for final hearing. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of parties and elephant ownership. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. petitioner claims rights and argues against hpc. (Para 5) |
| 4. peta contends against petitioner's claims. (Para 6) |
| 5. priority given to elephant’s welfare over religious rights. (Para 9) |
| 6. petition dismissed; elephant transfer ordered. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT :
Neela Gokhale, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the parties, the Petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. THE CHALLENGE :
2.1 By way of this Petition, the Petitioner seeks to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 27th December 2024 and 3rd June 2025 passed by the Respondent No.2-High Power Committee (‘HPC’) and also directions to the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 not to take any coercive action for transfer of the elephant namely Mahadevi @ Madhuri from the Petitioner Trust-Mathsansthan to the Respondent No.6- Radhe Krishna Elephant Welfare Trust at Jamnagar pursuant to the order impugned dated 27th December 2024 and 3rd June 2025 passed by the Respondent No.2.
3. PARTIES TO THE PETITION :
3.1 The Petitioner is a Trust registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 belonging to Jain discipline. The Petitioner Trust owns the elephant namely Mahadevi since the year 1992 and is stated to have a religious tradition to keep an elephant in the Math for religious programs. The maintenance of the elephant is an integral part of the Trust activities. The Respondent No.1 is the Union of India; the Respondent No.2 is the HPC; the Respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 are the Chief Wildlife Warden & Principal Chief Conservator of Forest of the Maharashtra State, the Chief Forest Conservator (Regional), Kolhapur and the Deputy Forest Conservator, Kolhapur respectively. The Respondent No.6 is the Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust (‘RKTEWT’) which is the receiving facility. This facility is stated to operate a specialized and well- equipped elephant care center i.e. suitable, appropriate and capable of receiving and caring for the said elephant. It is located in village Moti Khavdi, Jamnagar, Gujarat with an object of caring and rehabilitation of elephants that are injured, abandoned, rescued from circus and otherwise found to be neglected or abused. It is to this institution that the HPC has directed transfer and custody of the said elephant for its long term care and rehabilitation. The Respondent No.7 (‘PETA’) is a registered non-governmental animal rights organization with pan India operations. It is the original complainant which had represented to the HPC regarding the plight of captive female elephant Mahadevi, housed at the premises of the Petitioner-Math.
4. FACTS OF THE CASE :
4.1 The Petitioner is the owner of the said elephant having registration certificate No. MH/04/02KLP/203 issued under the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) (Maharashtra) (Amendment) Rules, 2004. According to the Petitioner, officials of the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 regularly visit the premises of the Petitioner and conduct check-up of the elephant.
4.2 On a representation made by PETA, the HPC by its order dated 28th December 2023 directed transfer of the said elephant from the Petitioner trust to the RKTEWT. The Petitioner filed a Writ Petition No.3713 of 2024 in this Court assailing the said order, being an ex-parte order. By order dated 13th March 2024, this Court requested the HPC to consider the representation dated 7th February 2024 made by the Petitioner and take a decision thereon within a period of 15 days after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. In the meantime, the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 were to defer the transfer of the said elephant. Accordingly, the HPC formed a sub-committee to visit the Petitioner’s premises and inspect the facilities and health conditions of the elephant and submit a report. The sub-committee visited the Petitioner’s premises on 12th June 2024 &
AI
The welfare of the elephant Mahadevi is prioritized over the Petitioner Trust's religious rights under Article 25, emphasizing the necessity for legal protection of animals as established in prior ca....
The right to use elephants for religious rituals is protected under Article 26, subject to compliance with health and welfare standards.
The court confirmed the legal permissibility of transferring captive Elephants by private owners when transfers are non-commercial, emphasizing protective oversight for their welfare.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the prohibition of commercial transfers of elephants without permission under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and the penal consequences for ....
The duty of citizens and the State to exhibit compassion to animals as enshrined in Art.51A of the Constitution and the importance of fundamental duties and their enforcement, especially in matters r....
The court mandates strict implementation of the Kerala Captive Elephants Rules to prevent cruelty and ensure welfare, emphasizing the judicial role in filling regulatory gaps.
The District Monitoring Committee must provide reasoned decisions when granting permits for parading elephants, ensuring compliance with statutory provisions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.