Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Milind N.Jadhav
Vice President, Somaiya Trust – Appellant
Versus
Pradnya d/o Gopalrao Giradkar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Milind N. Jadhav, J.
1. Heard Mr. D’Souza, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Dr. Warunjikar, Advocate appointed through legal aid for Respondent No.1; Ms. Mondol, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 and Ms. Nimbalkar, learned AGP for Respondent No.3.
2. The present Writ Petition is filed by Petitioners to challenge the judgment and order dated 09.04.2014 passed by the Mumbai University and College Tribunal in Appeal No.34 of 2011.
3. By virtue of the impugned judgment, Tribunal has set aside order of dismissal from service imposed by Petitioners on Respondent No.1 and directed her reinstatement in alongwith further directions. Petitioners have challenged the order on its merits.
4. If Petition fails on merits Respondent No. 1 cannot be put to a greater loss because of the omission of Petitioners. Had Petitioners reinstated her she would have joined service and submitted her voluntary retirement resignation in compliance of the impugned order itself. She was precluded from doing so by Petitioners. Though she has not challenged the order, she was admittedly precluded from filing her voluntary retirement resignation as directed. Therefore it is incorrect to argue on behalf of P
Charges of moral turpitude cannot be equated with legitimate complaints by an employee seeking redress for service rights; failure to comply with reinstatement orders deprives the employee of rightfu....
An employee wrongfully terminated without a proper enquiry is entitled to be treated as under deemed suspension and receive subsistence allowance during the period of the enquiry, ensuring protection....
The court held that the government may withdraw re-employment provisions for retired teachers according to policy changes, and that no vested rights were violated as re-employment was contingent upon....
The court upheld that willful non-compliance with judicial orders leads to dismissal of petitions, reinforcing obligations to follow Tribunal directives in employment matters.
Under Article 227, High Court cannot interfere with school tribunal's setting aside of prejudiced disciplinary inquiry where findings mismatch framed charges, absent perversity or natural justice vio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a policy decision to recall a previous decision, taken in the larger public interest, is valid and not unreasonable. The principle of legitima....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
