IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Ashok Mohanshankar Vernekar – Appellant
Versus
Shantaram M.Bhat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to appellate court's standard rent fixing (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments for fixing contractual rent vs. standard rent (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. overview of the bombay rent act on standard rent (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. tenants' right to seek standard rent reduction (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. landlord's position and tenant's exploitation of rent protection (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. critique of appellate court's reduction in contractual rent (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. final order and implications for the tenant (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. Petitioner-landlord has filed this petition challenging the judgment and order dated 18 March 1998 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court allowing the Revision Application No.33/1997 filed by the Respondent-tenant and setting aside the order dated 24 December 1996 passed by the Small Causes Court by which R.A.N. Application No. 691/SR of 1979 filed by the Respondent-tenant for fixation of standard rent in respect of the suit premises was rejected. The Revisional Court has fixed the standard rent of the suit premises at Rs.1000/- per month by reducing the same from contractual rent of Rs.2,000/- per month.
2. The P
Malpe Vishwanath Acharya and others vs. State of Maharashtra and another
The court reaffirmed that a landlord's contractual rent rate is valid unless proven excessive, emphasizing the ineffectiveness of arbitrary rent reductions in commercial leases under the Bombay Rent ....
The Maharashtra Rent Control Act does not allow fixation of standard rent for premises let after October 1, 1987; hence disputes in these instances are adjudicated based on Section 8's provisions all....
The court upheld that standard rent, defined by agreed terms, must guide rateable value assessments and cannot exceed set limits until judicial review occurs.
when a suit is filed for eviction of a tenant for being a defaulter in payment of rent, can the tenant thereafter file an application for fixation of rent.
The court established that once eviction proceedings are dismissed, landlords can claim contractual rents despite interim rates being set.
The court affirmed that landlords can seek fixation of fair rent under statutory law even during the existence of a long-term lease agreement.
The determination of rent increases under the Bombay Rent Act cannot be subjected to arbitration and must be handled by designated courts.
A tenant in default for over six months without disputing the rent is subject to eviction under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rent Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.