SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Del) 834

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAKESH SHARMA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK & ORS. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. claim for compensation due to road accident (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments on calculation of compensation (Para 5 , 6)
3. assessment method for notional income (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. precedents on notional income valuation (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. transition from notional income to minimum wage (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. minimum wage as standard for child compensation (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
7. verification of deceased's educational qualifications (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
8. future prospects considered in compensation (Para 27 , 28)
9. deduction for personal expenses (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
10. multiplier application for compensation calculation (Para 32 , 33 , 34)
11. total loss of dependency calculation (Para 35 , 36)
12. non-pecuniary heads of compensation (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
13. final compensation awarded to applicants (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT :

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by the Appellants/parents of the child, Harsh Sharma, aged about 14 years 10 months, who died in the road accident on 28.09.2017, to seek enhancement of compensation in the sum of Rs.10,20,000/- along with interest @ 6%

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top