SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1411

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NEELA GOKHALE, J.
 Blessing Amaka Okonko - Applicant 
Versus 
State of Maharashtra – Respondent 
Bail Application No.1627 of 2025
Decided On : 03-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Khushal Parmar, a/w Anjali More.
For the Respondent: Ms. Manisha R. Tidke, APP.

The court affirmed the strict compliance requirements of the NDPS Act in bail applications, emphasizing the need to demonstrate reasonable grounds for believing in the accused's innocence, particularly when charged with serious drug offenses.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8(c), 22(b), 22(c), 29, 42, and 50 - Bail application - Applicant arrested for possession of 460 grams of MD, a commercial quantity - Allegations of non-compliance with procedural safeguards under Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act were found baseless; compliance affirmed as sufficient by the Court - Evidence concerning Applicant's involvement in drug trafficking and potential flight risk discussed. (Paras 5, 10, 12, and 14)

(B) Bail - Standard of proof - The Applicant has to provide reasonable grounds for believing she is not guilty of the offence charged; the court emphasized importance of 'reasonable grounds' beyond mere prima facie evidence at bail stage. (Paras 12, 13, and 14)

Table of Content
1. factual background of narcotics case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments for and against bail application. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court analysis of legal compliance under ndps act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. consideration of reasonable grounds for bail refusal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. final decision on bail application. (Para 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

NEELA GOKHALE, J.

1. By this Application, the Applicant seeks her enlargement on bail in connection with FIR No. 01 of 2023 dated 01st January 2023 registered with the ANC, Ghatkopar Unit, Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 22(b), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( for short ‘NDPS Act’).

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as under:-

2.1 On 31st December 2022, at around 1800 hours, the officials of the ANC, Ghatkopar Unit, Mumbai, received information of sale of narcotics in Mumbai City. Armed with this information, the officials formed a team and set off for patrolling. They carried with them all the necessary material required for compliances under the NDPS Act. During patrolling, they found 2 persons lurking in suspicious circumstances near the Lotus Prime Cloth Store, Navrang Compound, Mahim-Sion Link Road Bridge, Mumbai. The Police stopped their vehicle a little ahead of them, and kept a watch on the activities of those two persons. It appeared that the said two persons were waiting for someone. Finally, the Police officials started to go upto them to make inquiries.

2.2 On seeing the Police, the said two persons scrambled to disperse. The Police caught up with them and began making inquiries. The persons gave evasive answers. Finding their behaviour suspicious, the Police proceeded to call two panchas. Thereupon, after complying with the requisites of the NDPS Act, they undertook a search of the said persons. 40 grams of Mephedrone ('MD') was recovered from the person of one of them namely, Nitin Chandrakant Adsul @ Papya. It was stored in a zip lock plastic pouch. Some cash was also recovered from him. Further, 110 grams of MD along with some cash were recovered from the other person namely, Reddy Mallesh Shadkinur @ Raju. The same was also stored in a zip lock plastic pouch.

2.3 Papya and Raju were brought to the Police Station and were arrested. Panchanamas were recorded and other formalities of the provisions of the NDPS Act were complied. On interrogation, Raju informed the Police that one lady namely, Blessing Okonko supplied 150 grams of MD to him out of which he had sold 40 grams to Papya. This lady is the Applicant herein.

2.4 At 4:55 am of 1st January 2023, the officials of the ANC, Ghatkopar Unit, Mumbai set off on patrolling duty to look for the Applicant at the location revealed by Raju. Raju accompanied the officials. The officials reached the location at about 6.30 am and laid a trap. The Applicant came near the location at around 7.15 am. She was pointed out to the Police by Raju. The Police stopped the Applicant and made inquiries regarding her identity. She gave evasive answers. She was also searched after following due process of law. A plastic zip lock pouch containing 460 grams of MD was recovered from the pocket of her jacket. Accordingly, the Applicant was also arrested on 1st January 2023.

3. The Applicant filed an application seeking bail in the Special Court for NDPS at Greater Bombay, however, by order dated 17th March 2025, the bail application was rejected. Hence, the Applicant is before this Court seeking reliefs as prayed.

4. Mr. Khushal Parmar, learned counsel appeared for the Applicant. He submitted that the Police have not complied with the provisions of Section 42 of the NDPS Act; there was no CDR, bank transactions or any WhatsApp chats of the Applicant with the co-accused; there is non-compliance of Section 50 of the NDPS Act as the personal search of the Applicant was taken by a Senior Police Inspector along with a lady police Sepoy and a lady panch. He submitted that they are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top