MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Johri – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 38/2016 registered under Sections 21/29/61/85 of the NDPS Act at P.S. Special Cell (SB), Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is in custody since 26.06.2016 and the charge sheet having been filed, he is no longer required for any investigation. She further submits that though the recovery of contraband is alleged to have taken place from the polythene bag held by the applicant, reading of the FIR would show that after searching the polythene bag, personal search of the applicant was also conducted and hence, Section 50 of the NDPS Act is applicable. It is also contended that there was violation in the present case of mandatory provision of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, as the applicants denial to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer was not recorded. In support of her submissions, learned counsel placed reliance on the decisions of the Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan v. Parmanand & Another reported as (2014) 5 SCC 345 and Dilip and Another
Dilip and Another vs. State of M.P. (2007) 1 SCC 450
Durand Didier vs. Chief Secretary
Karnail Singh vs. State of Haryana (2009) 8 SCC 539
State of Kerala and Others vs. Rajesh and Others (2020) 12 SCC 122
State of Kerala and Others vs. Rajesh and Others (2020) 12 SCC 122
State of Rajasthan vs. Parmanand & Another (2014) 5 SCC 345
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs. State of Gujarat (2011) 1 SCC 609
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.