IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
Vibha Kankanwadi, Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.
Sadik Abdulkadir Shiledar - Petitioners
Versus
The State Election Commission, Through its secretary - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 14436 of 2025
Decided On : 02-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural timeline for elections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. changes in election guidelines and notifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. potential voter confusion from overlapping election dates. (Para 6) |
| 4. petitioner's opposition to election scheduling changes. (Para 7) |
| 5. court’s refusal to intervene in election process. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. withdrawal of nomination and its implications. (Para 10) |
| 7. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Hiten S. Venegavkar, J.
1. By present petition petitioner seeks direction to the respondent authorities to commence the revised election program from the stage of scrutiny of election forms since various guidelines have been issued after the date of filing of the nomination form by the respondent No. 1 in respect of filing of the nomination forms. The petitioner further prays that petitioner No. 2 be allowed to participate in the revised election program by ignoring his earlier withdrawal of his nomination form.
2. The petitioner submits that respondent No. 1 had issued a notification dated 04.11.2025 and declared the elections of 246 Nagar Parishads and 42 Nagar Panchayats within the State of Maharashtra. The election program for the post of Members and the President of Nagar Parishads and Nagar Panchayats commenced from 06.11.2025 declaring the Collector of the respective districts to declare the election program. As per the election program dated 06.11.2025, the nomination form was to be filled from 10.11.2025 to 17.11.2025. The scrutiny of the nomination form was scheduled on 18.11.2025 and the date for withdrawal of the nomination form would be from 19.11.2025 till 21.11.2025. The election program also contemplated the statutory appeals which are likely to be filed against the rejection of the nomination forms and in such cases, the withdrawal of the nomination form was to be decided to be from 21.11.2025 to 25.11.2025. The date of allotment of symbol and to publish the list of the contesting candidates was scheduled on 26.11.2025. The date of poling was scheduled on 02.12.2025 and the date of counting and declaration of the result of scheduled on 03.12.2025.
3. Petitioner No. 2 has filed his nomination form for the post of ‘President’ and his form came to be declared as valid however, during the scheduled date for withdrawal, petitioner No. 2 has withdrawn his nomination from elections. The petitioner submits that while filing the nomination form, there were certain difficulties to the Returning Officer in respect of the candidate of the political party who have filed the nomination form from 10.11.2025 till 17.11.2025. The scrutiny of the nomination form was scheduled on 18.11.2025 and the date for withdrawal of the nomination form would be from 19.11.2025 till 21.11.2025. The election program also contemplated the statutory appeals which are likely to be filed against the rejection of the nomination forms and in such cases, the withdrawal of the nomination form was decided to be from 21.11.2025 to 25.11.2025. The date of allotment of symbol and to publish the list of the contesting candidates was scheduled on 26.11.2025. The date of poling was scheduled on 02.12.2025 and the date of counting and declaration of the result was scheduled on 03.12.2025.
4. Petitioner No. 2 has filed his nomination form for the post of President and his form came to be declare as valid however during the scheduled date for withdrawal, petitioner No. 2 has withdrawn his nomination from the elections. The petitioner submits that while filing the nomination form there were certain difficulties to the Returning Officer in respect of the candidate of the political parties who have filed the nomination form on behalf of the political party therefore the respondent No. 1 on 17.11.2025, issued the guidelines in respect of the main candidate and the secondary candidate of the political party. It is directed that if the candidate of a political party has filled the form of the signature of one proposer and has su
The court upheld the integrity of the election process and denied the petitioner's request to alter established procedures regarding nomination withdrawal, emphasizing adherence to legal protocols.
Elections must remain uninterrupted by pre-election challenges, as such grievances can only be adjudicated post-election through an election petition per Article 329(b).
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the timing of court intervention in the election process, the fulfillment of essential qualifications by candidates, and the availability of r....
Free and fair elections are the very foundation of democratic institutions and just as it is said that justice must not only be done but must also seem to be done, similarly elections should not only....
The failure to rectify substantial defects in a nomination paper justifies its rejection under the Representation of People Act, 1951.
In election disputes, the Returning Officer must allow candidates to rectify nomination defects; appellate courts must not interfere post symbol allotment without subserving electoral integrity.
Electoral postponements must be exercised with foresight and in exceptional circumstances to maintain the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that electoral timelines are adhered to and prev....
The nomination was rightly rejected due to substantial defects which could not be corrected post-deadline, validating the Returning Officer’s actions.
The plenary powers of the Election Commission of India under Article 324 of the Constitution to correct errors or deficiencies in the electoral process and the limitation of judicial intervention at ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.