SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1514

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
Laxmi Charitable Trust, through its Managing Trustee Mr. Hemant Vissanji – Petitioner
Versus
The University of Mumbai and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 322 Of 2012 With Chamber Summons No. 324 Of 2011 With Notice Of Motion No. 301 Of 2012 In Writ Petition No. 322 Of 2012
Decided On : 25-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Akshay Patil with Ms. Devika Madekar and Mr. Mukund Madekar i/b. Madekar & Co.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rui Rodrigues, Mrs. Gauri Sawant, AGP.

Management transfers and closures of educational institutions are governed by different statutory provisions; minority status institutions are entitled to protections that prevent unwarranted state interference with university decisions.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 - Section 3 - Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Section 81 and 92 - The decision to transfer management of degree colleges from Laxmi Education Society to Laxmi Charitable Trust was retraced by the State Government after four years, claiming the university lacked jurisdiction, which was contested by the Petitioner. The Court found that Section 81 governed management transfers specifically, while Section 92 applied to closures, confirming rights of minority institutions under Section 12. Court ruled the State Government's invocation of Section 92 was unwarranted; hence, the transfer decision was valid. (Paras 24, 33, 34)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner contested the State's abrupt decision to revert college management to a prior entity after the successful transfer of management to the Trust, facilitated by a government-approved process occurring approximately four years earlier.

Findings of Court:
The cancellation by the State Government was deemed unjustified, and the original management transfer was upheld.

Issues: The Court addressed the jurisdiction of the State versus the University concerning management transfers and the applicability of relevant statutes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that management transfers and closures operate under distinct statutory provisions, reaffirming minority status protections without unnecessary state intervention.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, impugned communications quashed.

Table of Content
1. court procedures and initial pleadings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. petitioner's grievance against management transfer. (Para 5 , 6 , 12)
3. background of previous legal orders and societal impacts. (Para 8 , 11 , 16)
4. clarification of section 92's application in context. (Para 24 , 25)
5. final ruling to quash the impugned decisions. (Para 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT :

Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.

1. This matter is listed in the “Prioritized Cases” category.

2. This Petition was lodged on 29th June, 2011. It was heard on the lodging number, and later, in 2012, it was assigned a regular registered number.

3. The Petitioner has put forth the following prayers :

“a) that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to the impugned decision of Respondent No.1 as informed by the impugned communication dated 23-6-2011 (EXHIBIT-"M" hereto) and impugned report dated 27-5-2011 (Exhibit-M-1 hereto) and of the impugned Management Council Resolution dated 30-5-2011 passed by the Respondent No.1 and after considering their legality, validity and propriety be pleased to quash and set-aside the same;

b) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition the Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 by themselves and through their officers, agents, servants and successors in office to act in pursuance of the Impugned decision dated 23-6- 2011 (EXHIBIT-M hereto) and impugned report dated 27-5-2011 (Exhibit-M-1 hereto) and the impugned Management Council Resolution dated 30-5-2011 of the Respondent No. 1;

c) that pending the hearing and final disposal of the present petition the Respondents be ordered and directed to provide information and/or give inspection and/or provide copies of all documents sought by the Petitioner in its communications listed in Exhibit-N hereto.”

4. We have heard the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, the learned Advocate for the University of Mumbai and the learned AGP for Respondent No.2, State.

5. The grievance voiced by the Petitioner in the Petition, is directed against the decision of the State Government, through the Department of Higher and Technical Education, by which the transfer of the management of two degree colleges from Laxmi Education Society (hereinafter referred to as the Society) to the Laxmi Charitable Trust (hereinafter referred to as the Trust), an arrangement that had been approved by the University by following the due process of law, more than four years prior to the impugned decision, was suddenly recalled at the instance of the State Government, and the management of the said two degree colleges, was re-transferred to Laxmi Education Society.

6. The Petitioner, Laxmi Charitable Trust, approached this Court with the specific contention that a former Minister, who was the then Minister of Higher and Technical Education, was the driving force behind the State Government’s decision to issue the impugned order. With the permission of this Court, the said Minister was added as Respondent No. 3, by name.

7. On 1st July 2011, this Court considered the grievance of the Petitioner and passed an order granting ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b), reproduced above. The ad-interim relief was continued from time to time, and by an order dated 28th November 2018, this Petition was admitted and the interim relief was continued.

8. It is specifically averred in the Petitioner’s pleadings that the Petitioner and Laxmi Education Society, which has common trustees, came together and mutually agreed to transfer two degree colleges of Laxmi Education Society to Laxmi Charitable Trust. The Society’s difficult economic condition was the primary reason for transferring the degree colleges to the Trust, which was financially strong.

DATES AND SEQUENCE OF EVENTS

9. The Society passed a resolution in 1999 to transfer the management of two degree colleges to the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top