Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S.SONAK, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
Deepak Shenoy – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. natural justice must precede inclusion in fraud registry. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. supreme court supports natural justice requirements. (Para 5) |
| 3. delay in filing does not negate the right to challenge. (Para 6 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. serious consequences necessitate compliance with natural justice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. inclusion quashed due to failure of natural justice compliance. (Para 14 , 17) |
| 6. final order quashing inclusion while allowing re-evaluation. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. We issue Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately, at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
3. The Petitioner, objects to the inclusion of his name in the Central Fraud Registry maintained by the Reserve Bank of India. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that such inclusion visits the Petitioner with serious civil consequence, and therefore, the same should have been preceded by at least the minimal compliance with the principles of natural justice and fair play.
4. He states that there was no such compliance and on this ground itself, the inclusion warrants interference.
5. Mr. Bhatiya, the lear
Inclusion in the Central Fraud Registry without adherence to natural justice principles is invalid, highlighting the necessity of timely notice and an opportunity to be heard.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for banks to adhere to the principles of natural justice, including providing notice and opportunity for representation, before ....
The classification of an account as fraud must adhere to principles of natural justice, including providing a reasoned order and opportunity to be heard.
The classification of an account as fraud involves the right to representation but does not mandate a personal hearing under the Master Directions on Fraud. This aligns with the principles of natural....
The Supreme Court ruled that classification of borrower accounts as 'fraud' requires adherence to natural justice, including notice, opportunity to respond, and access to forensic reports but does no....
The court affirmed that Section 36AAA of the Banking Regulation Act remains valid, allowing for the supersession of a cooperative bank's board for up to five years, without the necessity of a hearing....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
