SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Bharati Dangre, Nivedita P. Mehta, JJ.
Peter Dsouza & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
M/s Parmesh Constructions Company Limited & Ors. - Respondents
Public Interest Litigation Wp No.1884 of 2024 (F), Misc. Civil Application No.2023 of 2025 (F), Misc. Civil Application No.2024 of 2025 (F), Public Interest Litigation WP No.2020 of 2025
Decided On : 14-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr.Richard Almeida with Mr.Allan Andrade, Mr.Samuel Abraham and Ms.Seems Rivankar, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr.A.N.S. Nadkarni, Senior Advocate with Mr.Dattaprasad Lawande, Mr.Pradosh Dangui, Mr.S. Rebellow, Mr.Gauravvardhan A. Nadkarni, Mr.Jay Mathew, Ms.Akshaya Joglekar and Mr.Shulin Singbal, Ms.Akshata Bhatt, Additional Government Advocate for Mr.Nikhil Pai with Mr.Anant Nagi, Advocate Mr.Zeller D’Souza

Environmental clearances and building permissions must comply with statutory requirements, with due process upheld in assessments, ensuring that constructions on sloped terrains adhere to land use regulations.

Headnote:(A) Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010 - Section 6A.4 (Notes-1) - Town and Country Planning Act, 1974 - Section 17-A - Public Interest Litigation challenging the legality of technical clearances and construction license granted for a multi-family dwelling project in a 'No Development Slope' area - Petitioners claimed violations leading to environmental degradation and contravention of building regulations. Court found procedural compliance in granting permissions and dismissed the petitions. (Paras 1-2, 43-46)

(B) Environment Protection - Requirement for Environmental Clearance - No prior EC obtained for construction exceeding building area requirements resulting in violations of statutory notifications. (Paras 8, 10, 24-25)

(C) Procedural Compliance - Due process followed in granting relevant permissions; inspection carried out by authorities confirmed adherence to regulations preceding the issuance of development permissions. (Paras 6, 36-42)

Facts of the case:
Two Public Interest Litigations contested permissions granted for a construction project named 'Acqua Eden' located on sloped terrain in Sancoale village, highlighting environmental risks and procedural lapses in approvals of various construction licenses. Petitioners included civil society organizations and local residents alleging illegalities in the approval process.

Findings of Court:
The Court noted that the permissions were granted after thorough inspections and adherence to procedural norms; technical objections raised by petitioners were unfounded.

Issues: The main issues concerned the legality of the construction permissions in light of 'No Development Slopes' and Environmental Clearance requirements.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that all permissions were appropriately granted following established procedures and findings based on expert assessments of the property, dismissing claims that the project violated building regulations.

Result: Petitions dismissed with costs.

Table of Content
1. public interest litigation addressing construction permissions (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court's procedural compliance in hearing (Para 5 , 6)
3. objections concerning environmental regulations (Para 7 , 8)
4. arguments about legal access and zoning (Para 9 , 10)
5. procedural requirements in grant of permissions (Para 11 , 12)
6. response and clarifications from respondents (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
7. assessment of development slopes and regulations compliance (Para 24 , 28 , 37)
8. final court resolution and dismissal of petitions (Para 35 , 36 , 44)

JUDGMENT :

1. The two PIL Writ Petitions are filed for redressal of a common grievance, being illegal grant of technical clearance and in the matter of approval of plans by the Town and Country Planning Department of Government of Goa and Mormugao Planning and Development Authority (MPDA) for the proposed construction of Multi-Family Dwelling Villas and Swimming Pools in Survey No.257/1 of village Sancoale within limits of village panchayat Sancoale, Mormugao, Goa.Objection is also raised to the grant of construction license of village panchayat Sancoale in favour of the project proponent, M/s Parmesh Construction Company Ltd., having its registered office in Uttar Pradesh.

2. PIL Writ Petition No.2020 of 2025 is filed by Goa Bachao Abhiyan, a Non-Government Organisation through its Convenor, in which the project proponent is impleaded as Respondent No.5 and the Petition seeks the following reliefs :-

(a)Issue a writ of Certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the Technical Clearance/Development Permission No.MPDA/7-P-165/2023- 24/1254 dated 2/2/2024 granted by Respondent authorities in favour of Respondent No.5 for the project “Acqua Eden” in Survey No.257/1 of Sancoale village, as well as quashing the Construction License dated 11/3/2024 issued by the Village Panchayat of Sancoale for the said project, and any other consequential building permissions or clearances issued thereafter in respect of this project;

(b)Issue a writ of Certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the NOC/Permission dated 03/06/2025 under ref no. MPDA/7-P-165 (Part)/2025-26/332 granted by Respondent authorities in favour of Respondent No.5 for the project “Acqua Eden” in Survey No.257/1 of Sancoale village.”

Apart from the aforesaid reliefs, the Petition also seek issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the authorities to strictly enforce the Goa Land Development and Building Construction Regulations, 2010 and the EIA Notification 2006 in relation to the project in question and thereby restrain the project proponent from undertaking any construction or development work at the site, without ensuring its compliance.It is also prayed that the registration of the project “Acqua Eden” be suspended and the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) be directed to take appropriate action under Section 7 of the RERA ACT , 2016 against the promoter and direct RERA to issue a public notice or advisory informing the existing and potential buyers about the legal status of the project and warn them of the risk of investing into this project.

The PIL Writ Petition also seeks constitution of an independent Expert Committee to investigate the matter of illegal hill cutting alongwith the regulatory lapses in “Acqua Eden” project, which shall comprise of different functionaries, so that it can report to the Court on the alleged violations and feasibility of the project on the site, without causing any damage to the environment and also ix the accountability on the officers, who have acted in dereliction of duty.

The Petition filed by Goa Bachao Abhiyan specifically offers the particulars of the Petitioner, as a civil society organisation, formed in the year 2006, for adverting to public causes and has given its credentials in Part II of the Petition, with the details of the proceedings instituted by it in past in larger public interest and it i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top