Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.Jamadar
Ashok Shreekrishna Beharay – Appellant
Versus
Joint Charity Commissioner – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed against charity commissioner's order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the petitioner's status and challenges to removal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. interpretation of 'person having interest' in trust act. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. criteria for qualifying as a 'person having interest'. (Para 26 , 28 , 29) |
| 5. consequences of the petitioner's removal from trust membership. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. risks of petitioner's intervention regarding management issues. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 7. final dismissal of the petition. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
N.J. Jamadar, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
2. The challenge in this petition is to an order dated 2nd April, 2025 passed by the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune, on an application under Section 73A for impleadment of the petitioner as a party to a proceeding under Section 36A(3) of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (“the Trust Act, 1950”), whereby the said application came to be rejected.
3. The background facts necessary for the determination of this petition can be stated as under:
3.1 The Maharashtra Techni
The removal of a member from a Trust results in the loss of the right to intervene in related proceedings, as demonstrated in the absence of a demonstrated interest in a loan sanction application und....
Interpretation of 'person having interest' under the MPT Act and application of ejusdem generis principle in determining eligibility.
The court affirmed that interested persons in public trust matters have the right to join proceedings, and the concept of abatement does not apply, ensuring that inquiries can continue effectively.
Section 2(13) of the Trusts Act when the petitioner Society is registered under the Societies Registration Act and the same is registered for charitable purposes, it is deemed to be a charitable Trus....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of the settlement of the scheme for the better administration of the trust under Section 50a(1) of the Trusts act, 1950, and the affi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner to enroll new members were without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19(1)(c) o....
The Charity Commissioner can entertain removal applications under Section 41D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act even when Change Reports under Section 22 are pending, as the status of trustees does....
Trustees must comply with legal requirements for property management; failure to do so constitutes serious misconduct warranting removal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
