Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH
URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, NANDESH S.DESHPANDE
Gopal Krishna Banka Son of Late Sukhdeo Lal Banka – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Per : Nandesh S. Deshpande, J.)
1. Heard. Admit. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. This is an application seeking to quash the First Information Report in connection with Crime No.0016/2023, dated 9.2.2023, registered by Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 403, 406, 409, 417, 120-B read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and the consequential proceeding arising out of Charge-sheet No.78/2023, dated 23.12.2023, for the offences punishable under Sections 420 , 403, 406, 409, 417, 120-B read with Section 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , filed by Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Nagpur which is registered as R.C.C. No.4586/2023, which is pending for trial before the 8th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur.
3. The applicants are the directors of “Banka Bullions” and “G.K. Trexim” which is carrying business of Gold from Kolkata. As per the contentions of the applicants on 1.7.2020 the applicant No.1 herein received a summons dated 25.6.2020 from respondent No.1 inter alia informing him that that on 24.6.2020 a complaint has been lodged by one Ashut
Criminal proceedings cannot be initiated for purely civil disputes; necessary intent for criminal charges must be evident, or they risk being quashed as an abuse of legal process.
The distinction between civil disputes and criminal offenses is crucial; mere breach of contract does not constitute a criminal offense unless there is evidence of dishonest intention.
Mere non-payment for goods in a civil transaction cannot constitute cheating or criminal breach of trust under IPC; intent must be proven.
The High Court established that criminal proceedings cannot be pursued for matters fundamentally rooted in civil disputes, reinforcing the principle against abusing the legal system.
Point of law : exercise powers under Section 482 CrPC, the complaint in its entirety shall have to be examined on the basis of the allegation made in the complaint/FIR/charge-sheet and the High Court....
The court ruled that prima facie evidence supports the allegations against the petitioner, affirming that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised cautiously and not for merit as....
Criminal machinery cannot be applied to disputes primarily of a civil nature without clear evidence of fraud or deception at inception.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
