SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Machindra Maruti Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 286 of 2023
Decided On : 09-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: R.A. Tambe, Pooja Patare
For the Respondents: R.R. Bangar, G.A. Kulkarni, A.D. Aghav

Overwhelming medical evidence can establish COVID-19 infection for insurance claims, overriding a singular negative RTPCR result, emphasizing humane considerations in claim evaluation.

Headnote:(A) Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna - Insurance claims - COVID-19 fatalities - Claim rejected by Collector on grounds of absence of RTPCR report indicating COVID-19 positive status, despite evidence of death due to COVID-19 - Court found overwhelming medical evidence supporting claim, including hospital certificates and discharge summaries. (Paras 2, 10, 11, 12)

(B) Legal standards for proof of COVID-19 infection in insurance claims - The court emphasized that reliance on a single negative RTPCR test does not preclude the acknowledgement of COVID-19 infection based on comprehensive medical records and certificates evidencing the cause of death and treatment. (Paras 11, 12)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, whose wife died while working as a Nurse during the COVID-19 pandemic, challenged the Collector’s decision that rejected his insurance claim under the scheme for Covid warriors, citing lack of RTPCR report confirming her COVID-19 status.

Findings of Court:
The overwhelming medical evidence suggests that the deceased was COVID-19 positive at the time of her death, and therefore, the rejection of the claim based on the RTPCR results was unfounded. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: The court addressed whether the RTPCR report alone can determine eligibility for insurance claims for deceased health workers and the sufficiency of alternative medical evidence. (Paras 11, 12)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that insurance claims should not be strictly denied based on a singular negative RTPCR report when there is substantial contradicting evidence, reinforcing the application of humane considerations in evaluating claims. (Paras 11, 12)

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned order quashed; Collector directed to process the claim accordingly.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for insurance under pm garib kalyan yojna (Para 2 , 3)
2. rejection of claim due to lack of rtpcr evidence (Para 4 , 5)
3. evidence of medical records to substantiate covid-19 claim (Para 10 , 11)
4. judicial precedents supporting the claim despite technicalities (Para 12)
5. quashing of collector's rejection order and directive for processing claim (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. By consent of parties, heard finally.

2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 15.09.2022 passed by the respondent No. 3 – District Collector, Ahmednagar, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for being eligible to receive insurance amount of Rs.50,00,000/- under the scheme Prime Minister’s Garib Kalyan Yojna declared for the family members of corona warriors, doctors, health workers who died in Covid-19. The deceased was the wife of the petitioner and was working as a Nurse (ANM) since 1993 in Civil Hospital, Ahmednagar and she died on 5.5.2021 during covid period while performing her duty. The insurance claim is rejected by the Collector on the ground that the petitioner has not submitted the RTPCR report showing that the deceased, wife of the petitioner was covid positive at the time of her demise and the available RTPCR report indicated that the deceased was covid negative.

3. Brief facts leading to the institution of the present writ petition are noted as under :-

The wife of the petitioner – Manda Machindra Gaikwad was working as a Nurse (ANM) in Civil Hospital, Ahmednagar since 1993. The deceased, wife of the petitioner was working as Arogya Sevika at sub-centre Mulanagar which falls under Primary Health Centre, Bargaon Nandur. The deceased was appointed as Arogya Sevika on 31.3.2021 at Covid Care Centre, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Ahmednagar. The duty of the deceased was to check the temperature, oxygen level and provide necessary medicines to the covid positive patients. It is stated that the wife of the petitioner tested positive for Covid-19 on 30.4.2021 and passed away on 5.5.2021 because of infection of Covid-19. Thereafter the petitioner applied under Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojna which declared an insurance cover of Rs.50,00,000/- to the family of corona warriors, on the death of such corona warrior/worker. The petitioner made various representations to the concerned authority under the above scheme, however, the benefit was not extended to the petitioner. Thus, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 14450/2021 before this Court, wherein direction was issued to respondent No. 3 - Collector to decide the claim of the petitioner within four months. Thereafter, the respondent No. 3 – Collector decided the representation of the petitioner and vide impugned order dated 15.9.2022 rejected the claim of the petitioner. As such the present writ petition is filed.

4. Mr. R.A. Tambe holding for Mr. S.R. Wakale, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner is rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not produced the covid positive certificate of the deceased showing that the deceased was suffering from covid at the time of her demise and also the available RTPCR report of the deceased/wife of the petitioner showed that she was covid negative.

5. The learned counsel has taken us through the record produced along with his application to the Collector and submits that undisputedly wife of the petitioner was working as Arogya Sevika from 1993 and her appointment letter is on record. There is also certificate dated 12.7.2021 issued by the concerned Taluka Health Officer, certifying that the wife of the petitioner was working as Arogya Sevika at Primary Health Centre at Bargaon Nandur under sub-center Mulanagar and she died due to covid-19 infection in a Government Hospital, Ahmednagar. The work of the deceased included attending the covid patient etc. Her appointment letter dated 30.3.2021 shows that she was appoin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top