IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J.
Sri. A. Ganga Venkata Ramana, S/o. Late Lankalapalli Appala Raju & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Principal Secretary to Government Medical Health and Family Welfare Department & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 42418 of 2022
Decided On : 18-04-2024
(A) Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana - Ex-gratia payment - Claim for compensation due to death of frontline worker from Covid-19 - Requirement of RTPCR test certificate relaxed in special circumstances - Court directed timely disbursement of Rs.50,00,000/- to dependents of deceased. (Paras 8, 9, 11)
(B) Covid-19 - Frontline workers - Recognition of service and entitlement to compensation - Court acknowledged the deceased's role as a frontline worker and the circumstances leading to her death due to Covid-19. (Paras 8, 10)
Facts of the case:
The deceased mother of the Writ Petitioners was a frontline worker in the Covid Ward and succumbed to Covid-19 complications after testing positive. The claim for Ex-gratia was initially rejected due to the absence of an RTPCR test, but the State Government later sanctioned the payment.
Findings of Court:
The Court found that the deceased's death was due to Covid-19 while performing her duties as a frontline worker, and the absence of an RTPCR test should not hinder the claim for compensation.
Issues: The main issues were the necessity of RTPCR test results for compensation claims and the recognition of the deceased's status as a frontline worker.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the absence of an RTPCR test certificate should not bar the claim for Ex-gratia, given the circumstances of the deceased's employment and the nature of her duties.
Result: Writ Petition allowed.
ORDER :
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.
Heard Sri Mathukumilli Sri Vijay, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Sri Kondala Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical and Health and Sri G. Arun Showri, Learned Standing Counsel for the Central Government appearing for the Respondent No.7.
2. Writ Petitioners are the sons of the deceased mother. The deceased mother was working in the Covid Ward in the Government General Hospital at Kakinada. During the Course of her employment, she was contacted with Covid-19 and tested positive for Covid-19 and soon thereafter, the mother of the Writ Petitioners had succumbed due to complications on account of Covid infection. During the short period, while she was being treated for Covid-19, the Respondent No.6 had referred the case of the patient (mother of the Writ Petitioners) for conduct of Rapid Antigen Test. The result of the said test was positive to the effect that the mother of the Writ Petitioners had contacted Covid-19. Due to the fact that the mother of the Writ Petitioners contacted Covid while she was working in the Covid Ward during the peak of the Covid period and that it is on account of her being involved as a ‘front-line worker’ rendering services in the Covid Ward as Nurse, she had contacted Covid. The Doctors in the Government General Hospital, Kakinada, made best possible efforts despite which they could not save her. She was admitted in the Hospital on 27.04.2021 for treatment and had died on 30.04.2021 at 02.15 P.M. The Death Audit Proforma issued by the District Expert Committee would indicate that the deceased mother had initially shown symptoms on 25.04.2021 and also the sample was collected on 27.04.2021 for Rapid Antigen Test on the same date and the result tested positive. She was kept on Oxygen supported in the Government General Hospital, Kakinada.
3. As per the Government Scheme bearing G.O.Rt.No.299, dated 14.06.2021, the claim for granting Ex-gratia in the case of a death, Covid-19 Positive Certificate and the Death Certificate stating that the death is due to Covid-19 are mandatory. In this respect, there are guidelines issued by the Government of India which show that the Laboratory Report (RTPRC), certifying that the Medical Test is positive, is required. The mother of the Writ Petitioners, who was working as Female Nursing Orderly (FNO) had admittedly died due to Covid infection. As admitted by Respondent No.5 (Superintendent of the Respondent No.6), though the Rapid Antigen Test tested positive, the mother of the Writ Petitioners had expired before the RTPCR test was done. The record also would indicate that though the mother of the Writ Petitioners had symptoms since 25.04.2021, for the first time, she was subjected to Rapid Antigen Test only on 27.04.2021 and within two and half days thereafter, she had breathed her last.
4. The record would indicate that the State Authorities had demanded certain Medical Certificates, particularly with regard to RTPCR Test, basing on which the District Collector rejected the Application of the Writ Petitioners vide Memo dated 09.12.2022 (Ex.P.1). However, thereafter, after being fully satisfied that the mother of the Writ Petitioners had died due to Covid while working as Female Nursing Orderly in the Covid Ward at Government General Hospital, Kakinada on 30.04.2021, the State Government had released Rs.15,00,000/- which is part of the Ex-gratia that fell to the share of the State Government. Under Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojana Package through Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, there is an obligation cast on the Central Government to release Rs.50,00,000/-. Under the scheme, the cut-off date for the Union of India to receive Covid-19 claims is 31.07.2023. Initially, on account of the rejection of the claim vide Order dated 09.12.2022, the Petitioners had approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition on 29.12.2022.
5. Having considered the elementary facts, this Court, by Order dated 01
The court ruled that the absence of an RTPCR test certificate does not preclude compensation claims for frontline workers who died from Covid-19 while performing their duties.
The court ruled that formal documentation is not strictly necessary for ex gratia compensation if the employee's duties inherently involved exposure to Covid-19, especially during the pandemic.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to receive the ex gratia amount of Rs. 70 Lakhs under Regulation 29-A (2) of JdVVNL Pension Regulations, 1988 and....
Preponderance of probability suffices for COVID-19 duty death benefits via symptoms, hospital records despite no RTPCR; rejection ignoring evidence and delayed committee opinion set aside, directing ....
The court upheld that claims under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Package necessitate strict compliance with eligibility and documentation requirements, failure of which results in dismissal.
In peculiar facts, court directed ex-gratia Covid compensation to family of frontline municipal employee bypassing further scrutiny of technical procedural lapses like private hospital admission and ....
Overwhelming medical evidence can establish COVID-19 infection for insurance claims, overriding a singular negative RTPCR result, emphasizing humane considerations in claim evaluation.
The court ruled that essential services performed by an Anganwadi worker during the pandemic did not qualify for ex-gratia compensation under the Cabinet Decision for COVID-19 specific duties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.