Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
VALMIKI MENEZES
Maria Eulalia Leopoldina Carvalho D/o Late Isidoro Carvalho – Appellant
Versus
John Philip Pereira S/o Antonio Pereira – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
1. Registry to waive office objections and register the matter.
2. Heard learned Advocates for the parties.
3. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith; at the request of and with the consent of learned Advocates for the parties, the matter is finally heard and disposed of. Learned Advocate, Mr. Vivek Rodrigues waives service on behalf of the Petitioners, learned Advocate Ms. Fawia Menezes Mesquita waives service on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and learned Advocate Ms. Amira Razaq, waives service on behalf of Respondent No.2.
4. This petition challenges two orders passed by the Court of Civil Judge Junior Division ‘A’ Court at Vasco Da Gama in Civil Misc. Application No. 36/2018/B (filed under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC in Regular Civil Suit No. 83/2008/B). The first order under challenge is dated 12.02.2020, by which the Civil Court allowed an application at Exhibit D-9 filed by Respondent No. 1 herein, permitting him to intervene in the application (Civil Misc. Application No. 36/2018/B). The second order dated 01.04.2025, which has been impugned herein, by which an application at Exhibit D-37 dated 27.06.2024, filed by the Plaintiff, seeking recall of the first o
Orders permitting intervention and setting aside a decree were quashed due to non-compliance with natural justice, as the original Plaintiff was not served before her death, questioning the interveno....
The service of notice to any adult family member, including a female, is valid despite local amendments restricting it to male members, thus upholding the decree passed. Refusal to appear without suf....
The court reinforced that obstruction claims in execution proceedings must be heard to uphold rights, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
The court affirmed that procedural fairness and the right to be heard are fundamental under the Telangana Abolition of Inams Act, highlighting jurisdictional limits when voiding third-party rights wi....
Practice and Procedure - No error in decision of Trial Court to take up application under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC for hearing and disposal despite having already heard parties on application under Or....
The court emphasized the necessity of effective service of summons and adherence to procedural mandates in civil proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
