SANJAY DWIVEDI
Colonel Ali – Appellant
Versus
Fusions Infraestate Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
This MCC has been filed by the applicant under Order 9 Rule 13 and Sections 151 and 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure asking relief therein to set aside the order passed on 22.06.2018 in Review Petition No. 913/2018 and the decree drawn in pursuance to the order dated 22.06.2018 be also set aside.
2. The facts adumbrated in nutshell are that non-applicant Nos. 1 and 2 entered into an agreement on 24.12.2013 to sell the land belonging to Kh. No. 244, 240/2, 243/1 and 244/1 situated at Patwari Halka No. 11 of Village Jharkhera, Tehsil and District Sehore, total area measuring 11.20 acres. The non-applicant No. 3, on the basis of power of attorney of non-applicant No. 2 (Smt. Jyoti Goyal) executed the sale deed for sale of 3.25 acres of land on 15.07.2014 in favour of non-applicant No.1.
3. A civil suit was filed by non-applicant No.1 for specific performance of agreement entered into between the parties and after filing the civil suit, on the basis of an application for amendment, the nomenclature of the plaintiff was changed.
4. An application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC was filed by the non-applicant No. 3 namely, Bilal Hussain for rejecting the plaint and vide order dated 02
State of Gujarat vs. Diwaliben Radhav Khant and others
Kalipada Dinda and others vs. Kartick Chandra Hait and others
Puthan Veettil Sankaran Nair vs. Poomulli Manakkal Moopil Sthanam Parameswaran Namboodiripad
Lakshmi Ram Bhuyan vs. Hari Prasad Bhuyan and others
Sagua Barik vs. Bichinta Barik and another
Banwari Lal vs. Chando Devi (Smt.) (Through L.Rs.) and another
K. Venkatachala Bhat and another vs. Krishna Nayak (D) By LRS. And others
Gurpreet Singh vs. Chatur Bhuj Goel
Sunil Poddar and others vs. Union Bank of India
Rajasthan Housing Board vs. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited and another
An appeal against a decree based on disputed consent terms is maintainable under Section 96 of the CPC, bypassing the restrictions applied to true consent decrees.
The court reinforced that obstruction claims in execution proceedings must be heard to uphold rights, ensuring adherence to natural justice principles.
An appeal against a consent decree is barred under Section 96(3) of the CPC; aggrieved parties must contest the decree's validity in the same court that issued it.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.