Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.M. SATHAYE
Deepak, S/o Shivkumar Bahry – Appellant
Versus
Heart And Soul Entertainment Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed under article 227 challenging eviction order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. revisional authority misjudged usage of premises. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondent's claims deemed an attempt to misuse judicial processes. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 4. court confirmed eviction and cost sanctions. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned Judgment and Order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division in Revision Application No. 132 of 2009 under Section 44 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (‘MRC Act’ for short). By the said impugned order, the revision application filed by the Respondent is allowed thereby setting aside the Judgment and Order dated 15.04.2009 passed by the Competent Authority Rent Act, Konkan Division, Mumbai in Case No. 38 of 2008 under Section 24 of MRC Act. By the impugned order, the eviction order passed by the Competent Authority has been set aside.
2.a) The Petitioner is a licensor and Respondent is a licensee in respect of suit flat which is Flat No. 105, Matruchhaya building No. 42, MHADA Complex, Near Oshiwara Police Station,
A residential license agreement's terms govern usage, and partial commercial use does not nullify eviction rights under statutory provisions.
Possession linked to an Agreement for Sale negates the Competent Authority's jurisdiction under the Rent Control Act for eviction proceedings.
Important Point : The jurisdiction of the Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act is contingent on the license being granted for residential purposes; commercial licenses require l....
The appeal upheld that expired leave and license agreements do not confer tenant rights; occupancy post-expiration was considered trespassing.
The nature of an agreement, whether lease or license, is determined by the real intention of the parties as decipherable from the document and surrounding circumstances. The court's interference with....
Tenancy and Land laws - Eviction - There is nothing that petitioners have been able to bring forth to indicate that finding has been arrived at by a misreading of facts or omitting relevant evidence ....
A tenant cannot dispute the title of the landlord, and genuine need for premises must be established without alternative accommodation for eviction to be warranted. Adverse possession claims require ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
