Sudha Rajendra Mahajan VS Vikas Narayan Patil

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Sudha Rajendra Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Narayan Patil – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. A.S. Sawant
For the Respondent: Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, Mr. S.N. Kendre

Table of Content
1. eviction based on license agreement execution. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. competent authority's prior orders confirmed. (Para 5 , 6)
3. arguments on registration and limitation. (Para 7 , 8 , 19)
4. applicability of limitation act discussed. (Para 9 , 10 , 20)
5. evidence from agreement deemed conclusive. (Para 11 , 12)
6. consequences of non-registration clarified. (Para 13 , 15 , 17)
7. understanding of registration acts' nuances. (Para 14 , 16)
8. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT :

S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Heard finally with consent of parties at admission stage.

2. Petitioners (original opponents) have approached this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik in Rent Revision Application No.538 of 2023 by which the order dated 26.5.2023 passed by the Competent Authority in Summary Application No.7 of 2012 has been confirmed, directing eviction of petitioners from suit house property.

3. Respondent/(original applicant) herein approached the competent authority under section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 claimin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

S. G. CHAPALGAONKARSudha Rajendra Mahajan – AppellantVersusVikas Narayan Patil – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR
Sudha Rajendra Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Vikas Narayan Patil – Respondent