IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA
M.S.SONAK, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
Myra Philomena Collaco – Appellant
Versus
Lilian Coelho – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Advait M. Sethna, J.
Prologue :-
1. We are confronted with yet another family saga where the slugfest between the parties, circumference around two Wills of the deceased parents of the Appellant. It is in such context that the contesting parties seek to assert their rival claims and legal rights over the suit property.
2. The curtains open with the Appellant’s deceased father’s Will creating life interest in the suit property in favour of his wife i.e. late mother of the Appellant along with their sons Victor and Neville. However, the Appellant’s mother bequeaths the suit property being the subject matter of the probated Will of her late husband (Appellant’s father) to the Appellant and her sons George and Reginald.
3. The Appellant in the present proceedings, desir to have Letters of Administration issued with the Will of her deceased mother which was assailed by the Respondents before the learned Single Judge of this Court. The impugned judgment and order holds that though the Will is formally proved, there are suspicious circumstances shrouding the said Will which ought to be considered to the satisfaction of the Court. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge refused to gran
Uma Devi Nambiar and Ors Vs. T. C. Sidhan (Dead)
Smt. Malkani Vs. Jamadar and Ors.
Ved Mitra Verma Vs. Dharam Deo Verma
Rabindra Nath Mukherjee and Anr Vs. Panchanan Banerjee (Dead) By Lrs and Ors.
Krishna Kumar Birla Vs. Rajendra Singh Lodha & Ors.
Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon Vs. Hardyal Singh Dhillon and Ors
Valliammai Achi Vs. Nagappa Chettiar& Anr
Suresh Kumar Kohli Vs. Rakesh Jain & Anr.
Smt. Jaswant Kaur v. Smt. Amrit Kaur & Ors.
Indu Bala Bose & Ors. vs. Manindra Chandra Bose & Anr.
Surendra Pal & Ors. Vs. Dr Mrs. Saraswati Arora & Anr.
A propounder of a Will must dispel any suspicious circumstances regarding its execution; failure to do so results in denial of probate or Letters of Administration.
Will – When suspicious circumstances exist and have not been repelled to satisfaction of Court, Court would not be justified in holding that Will is genuine since signatures have been duly proved and....
A will must be executed in accordance with statutory requirements, and any suspicious circumstances must be adequately addressed by the propounder for the will to be validated.
A holographic Will is presumed valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. Delays in seeking letters of administration do not invalidate the Will if the right to apply arises from lega....
The propounders have the onus to prove due execution of a Will as per the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. When there are suspicious circumstances, a greater onus lies o....
The propounder of a Will must satisfactorily dispel all suspicious circumstances regarding its validity, particularly when substantial benefits accrue to them, or the Will may be deemed invalid.
The propounder of a Will must prove its execution and validity, and the presence of suspicious circumstances must be specifically pleaded by the opposing party to shift the burden of proof.
A will's validity must be proven beyond suspicion, especially when claims of fraud or undue influence arise; the burden of proof lies on the party benefiting from the will under suspicious circumstan....
(1) When a Will is allegedly shrouded in suspicion, its proof ceases to be a simple lis between plaintiff and defendant.(2) Genuineness of Will must be proved by proving intention of testator to make....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.