Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBA
M.S.SONAK, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
Myra Philomena Collaco – Appellant
Versus
Lilian Coelho – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of familial dispute over wills (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 10 , 21) |
| 2. court's analysis on suspicious circumstances surrounding the will (Para 12 , 25 , 72 , 76) |
| 3. arguments for the appellant regarding the legitimacy of the will (Para 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 39) |
| 4. legal precedent on will execution and proof requirement (Para 70 , 74 , 78) |
| 5. court's decision to dismiss the appeal (Para 131 , 132) |
JUDGMENT :
Advait M. Sethna, J.
Prologue :-
1. We are confronted with yet another family saga where the slugfest between the parties, circumference around two Wills of the deceased parents of the Appellant. It is in such context that the contesting parties seek to assert their rival claims and legal rights over the suit property.
2. The curtains open with the Appellant’s deceased father’s Will creating life interest in the suit property in favour of his wife i.e. late mother of the Appellant along with their sons Victor and Neville. However, the Appellant’s mother bequeaths the suit property being the subject matter of the probated Will of her late husband (Appellant’s father) to the Appellant and her sons George and Reginald.
3. The Appellant in the present proceedings,
A propounder of a Will must dispel any suspicious circumstances regarding its execution; failure to do so results in denial of probate or Letters of Administration.
The burden of proof lies with the propounder of a will to dispel any suspicious circumstances surrounding its execution, necessitating judicial satisfaction regarding the will's authenticity.
Will – When suspicious circumstances exist and have not been repelled to satisfaction of Court, Court would not be justified in holding that Will is genuine since signatures have been duly proved and....
A will must be executed in accordance with statutory requirements, and any suspicious circumstances must be adequately addressed by the propounder for the will to be validated.
A holographic Will is presumed valid unless strong evidence is presented to the contrary. Delays in seeking letters of administration do not invalidate the Will if the right to apply arises from lega....
The propounders have the onus to prove due execution of a Will as per the requirements of Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. When there are suspicious circumstances, a greater onus lies o....
The due execution and attestation of a will, once proven, cannot be nullified by mere suspicion unless substantial evidence of invalidity is presented.
The propounder of a Will must satisfactorily dispel all suspicious circumstances regarding its validity, particularly when substantial benefits accrue to them, or the Will may be deemed invalid.
The propounder of a Will must prove its execution and validity, and the presence of suspicious circumstances must be specifically pleaded by the opposing party to shift the burden of proof.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
