IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Shree Datta Deosthan Trust, Through its authorized Trustee Secretary, Shri Sanjay Kshirsagar - Petitioner
Versus
Shri Murlidhar Eknath Rishipathak and Anr. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 9543 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9544 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9545 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9564 of 2025 With Civil Application No.10580 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9565 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9979 of 2025, Writ Petition No. 9980 of 2025
Decided On : 24-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. change reports concerning trustee removals and appointments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments for removal of permanent trustee milind kshirsagar. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's interpretation of trust constitution regarding permanent trustees. (Para 9 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. findings on the validity of trustee removal process. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. directions for amending trust constitution and future appointments. (Para 32 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties heard finally.
2. All these petitions are taken up together as they are inter connected and relates to sequential change reports filed of the Petitioner / Trust under Section 22 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act.
Writ Petition No.9544 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.557/2003, whereby removal of the trustee Milind Govind Kshirsagar was reported by trustee Vitthal Laxman Atre. At the relevant time the other trustees were Madhukar Narhar Phadke (Secretary), Suhas Gangadhar Bhagwat, Sharad Ramchandra Pendse, Vilas Vinayak Dange, Vitthal Laxman Atre, Sudhir Malhar Kulkarni and Shrikant Nagesh Dharmadhikari.
Writ Petition No.9565 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.750 of 2003, whereby the reporting trustee Vitthal Laxman Atre reported a new appointment of Sudhir Vinayak Kshirsagar in the vacant place of Milind Govind Kshirsagar.
Writ Petition No.9543 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.722/2005, whereby the reporting trustee Shri Vitthal Laxman Atre reported names of the retiring trustees as Madhukar Narhar Phadke, Sudhir Malhar Kulkarni, Vilas Vinayak Dange and the re-appointed trustees as Sudhir Malhar Kulkarni, Vilas Vinayak Dange including the newly appointed trustee namely Shrikant Digambar Kavthekar.
Writ Petition No.9564 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.956/2006, whereby new appointment is made of Sanjay Shivaji Kshirsagar on the place of Purushottam Berde, who had resigned earlier and the change is reported by Shrikant Kavthekar.
Writ Petition No.9979/2025 relates to Change Report No.634/2007, whereby name of Suhas Gangadhar Bhagwat is removed from trusteeship on account of his resignation. Writ Petition No.9545 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.1022/2008, whereby retiring and re-appointment of trustees, are reported. The re-appointed trustees are Sanjay Shivaji Kshirsgar, Sudhir Vinayak Kshirsgar and new appointments are Shrirang Gangadhar Jeste, Sudhir Mali and Vinod Purushottam Namjoshi.
Writ Petition No.9980 of 2025 relates to Change Report No.1281/2011, wherein retirement and appointment of trustees are reported. Retiring trustees are Shrirang Gangadhar Jeste, Vilasvinayak Dange, Shrikant Digambar Kavathekar and new appointments being Nitin Shrinivas Jogalekar and Prakash Maheshwar Pradhan.
3. By the respective impugned orders, all the above change reports are rejected by the Deputy Charity Commissioner, so also, by the appellate authority i.e. the Joint Charity Commissioner. Against the concurrent orders passed by the authorities below the present writ petitions are filed and they are taken up together as in the course of discussion of this Judgment. It would be seen that acceptance or rejection of each change report will have cascading effect on the next change report being accepted or rejected.
CHANGE REPORT NO.557/2003
4. The trust resolved to file the Change Report in the office of the Deputy Charity Commissioner, reporting the change of removal of Milind Kshirsagar (Respondent No.1). It was also resolved that Trustee Shri Vithal Atre will be the reporting trustee of the Change Report. On 10.06.2022, Change Report No.557/2003 was filed.
Milind Kshirsagar filed a written statement and opposed the change report.
On 18.02.2010, the learned Assistant Charity Commissioner rejected the Change Report No.557/2003. Aggrieved by this Judgment of the Assistant Charity Commissioner, the petitioner herein preferred an Appeal No.01/2010 before the learned Joint Charity Commissioner, Pune Region, Pune. The app


Trustees cannot unilaterally remove a permanent trustee without proper authority and adherence to legal procedures outlined in the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act.
The Charity Commissioner can entertain removal applications under Section 41D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act even when Change Reports under Section 22 are pending, as the status of trustees does....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a high degree of proof for drastic actions such as removal of trustees under Section 41-D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of the settlement of the scheme for the better administration of the trust under Section 50a(1) of the Trusts act, 1950, and the affi....
The court reaffirmed the necessity of proper notice, inquiry, and quorum in Trust administration, establishing that interested parties may challenge Trust governance despite assertions of lack of sta....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of the authority to provisionally accept the change report and decide the inquiry within a stipulated period, as per the provisions ....
Filing of Change Report – It is not mandatory that a written application be filed seeking condonation of delay and relief can be granted in that regard even upon an oral request, provided sufficient ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the directions issued by the Joint Charity Commissioner to enroll new members were without jurisdiction and in violation of Article 19(1)(c) o....
It is further observed that Administration of Trust would mean administration by a body which under the Trust-Deed is required to be administered the same. It is further observed that in absence of p....
Trustees must comply with legal requirements for property management; failure to do so constitutes serious misconduct warranting removal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.