Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Milind N.Jadhav
Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund – Appellant
Versus
IndusInd Bank Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judicial proceedings initiated based on petitioner's request. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on financial defaults and attachments of property. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments supporting the precedence of provident fund dues. (Para 4) |
| 4. opposing arguments from the bank and financial institution. (Para 5) |
| 5. court observations on jurisdiction and due process. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. clarification on legal procedures and parties involved. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 7. conflict between epf act and sarfaesi act regarding debt priority. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. petition dismissed based on conflicts of legal provisions. (Para 19) |
| 9. petitioner advised to seek redressal through appropriate channels. (Para 20 , 21) |
Milind N. Jadhav, J.
1. Heard Mr. Rattesar, learned Advocate for Petitioner, Mr. Samanataray, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 1 and Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for Respondent No.6.
2. Present Petition is filed seeking auction of Respondent No.2’s property / premises as per valuation done by Petitioner under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short “the EPF Act”) and to restrain Respondent Nos.1 to 6 from taking possession of Fla
The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 prevails over the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, allowing se....
The Employees' Provident Fund dues have priority over other claims, including mortgages, as confirmed by law, which the court upheld when dismissing the writ petition.
Secured creditors' rights under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act take precedence over state tax claims, confirming the principle of priority for registered interests.
The EPF Act prioritizes workers' dues over all other liabilities, and prohibitory orders must comply with statutory inquiry procedures to protect employees' rights.
Secured creditors have priority over State debts under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, invalidating conflicting State charges on mortgaged assets.
Secured creditors' debts take precedence over state tax claims, as established by Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act.
Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act establishes that secured creditors have priority over State revenue claims, reinforcing the enforceability of secured debts post-registration.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
