VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Kuberbhai Madhabhai Kher – Appellant
Versus
Department Of State Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Vaibhavi D. Nanavati, J.) :
1. Issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Ms. Pooja K. Ashar, learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Manish S. Shah, learned advocate waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent No.4.
2. Heard Mr. B.C. Thakkar, learned advocate with Ms. Noopur K. Dalal, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, Ms. Pooja K. Ashar, learned AGP appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Mr. Manish S. Shah, learned advocate appearing for the respondent No.4.
3. By way of present petition, the petitioner herein has prayed for quashing of the impugned charge or mortgage on the property being non-agriculture land with factory, land and building bearing survey No. R.S. No.423/paiki 6, Vaghel Road, PO. Harij, Taluka-Harij, District: Patan, admeasuring about 4755 Sq. Mtrs. in the name of Tirupati Cotton Ginning Partners and the property being non-agriculture land with factory, land and building bearing Survey No. at R.S. No.423/paiki1/P, Vaghel Road, PO.Harij, Taluka-Harij, District : Patan, admeasuring about 6171 Sq. Mtrs. in the name of Bhagwanbhai Parsottambhai Patel, in the registration, S
Bank of Bihar v. State of Bihar
Central Bank of India Vs. Siriguppa Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. & Ors. (2007) 8 SCC 353
Dena Bank v. Bhikhabhai Prabhu Dass Parikh and Another
Kalupur Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. State of Gujarat
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited vs. Girnar Corrugators Pvt. Ltd.
Madhaviben Jitendrabhai Rupareliya vs. State of Gujarat in Special Civil Application No.9565 of 2023
Punjab National Bank v. Union of India
Stock Exchange, Bombay v. V.S.Kandalgaonkar
Union of India vs SICOM Ltd. & Anr. Reported in (2009) 2 SCC 121
Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act establishes that secured creditors have priority over State revenue claims, reinforcing the enforceability of secured debts post-registration.
Secured creditors' rights under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act take precedence over state tax claims, confirming the principle of priority for registered interests.
Secured creditors have priority over State debts under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, invalidating conflicting State charges on mortgaged assets.
Secured creditors' debts take precedence over state tax claims, as established by Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act.
The provisions of Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act 2002 and Section 31B of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 create "First Charge" by way of priority in favour of the Banks and Financial ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the charge of the Secured Creditor will precede over the charge of an Unsecured Creditor (Crowns Date) based on the provisions of the SARFAESI....
Bank is entitled only for a priority in payment alone, it can never be said to be a charge created over property against statutory charge contained under KGST Act, 1963 and KVAT Act, 2003 or any Cent....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.