SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1876

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
S.M.MODAK
Dineshkumar Gokuldas Kalantry – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, (At the instance of EOW, General Cheating, Unit I, MECR No.02/2005) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Mr. Aabad Ponda (Sr. Adv.) i/b. Mr. Karan L. Jain
For the Respondents: Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP, Mr. Subhash Jha a/w Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Sumeet Upadhaya, Mr. Ashish Saxena and Mr. Chetan Gogawale i/b. Law Global Advs.
For the Intervenor : Mr. Jamshed Ansari.

Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court addresses whether a Magistrate can order further investigation after charges have been framed and the necessary justification for such an order (!) (!) (!) . - The judgment clarifies the applicable law and precedents governing post-charge further investigation, including Vinubhai, Amrutbhai, Rampal Gautam, Hasanbhai, and related cases, and the balance between fair investigation and fair trial (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) . - The court disposes of the application for further investigation, holding that the Magistrate’s order for further investigation after charges were framed was not justified, and directs the trial to proceed with existing materials (!) (!) (!) (!) - (!) .

Question 1?

Question 2?

Question 3?


Table of Content
1. background of the case and procedural history (Para 1 , 2)
2. overview of initial investigations and proceedings (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. discussion on the power and procedures for further investigation (Para 6 , 10 , 12)
4. rights and fair trial considerations in criminal proceedings (Para 7 , 8 , 14)
5. judicial precedent on further investigation applications (Para 11 , 29)
6. legislative context of further investigation provisions (Para 36 , 37 , 38)
7. court's reasoning and rationale for dismissing further investigation application (Para 42 , 43 , 44)
8. final order dismissing the request for further investigation (Para 45)

JUDGMENT :

S.M. MODAK, J.

1. The only issue arisen in this Application is “whether the learned Metropolitan Magistrate was justified in ordering further investigation on the application of the Complainant particularly when charge is framed.” The said order was passed on 14th December 2018 by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Esplanade, Mumbai in Case No.771/PW/2010. Earlier, there was an order of ‘issuance of process’ for the offences under Sections 420 , 418, 465, 468, 471, 506(II), 201 read with 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1860 (“

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top