Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHAILESH P.BRAHME
Shriram, S/o. Madhav More, Since deceased through his L.Rs.-Anusaya, (Wd/o. Ram More) – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Halid Abdul Samad Patel, (Died.) through His L.Rs.- Abdul Samad, S/o. Abdul Khaleq Patel – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHAILESH P. BRAHME J.
Taken up for final hearing with the consent of the parties.
02. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2006 passed by Lower Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal No 123/2002 reversing the decree of trial court and thereby granting decree for specific performance of contract and possession, present appeal is preferred by original defendant nos. 3 to 5.
03. Respondent no. 2 is the original plaintiff, who had filed Regular Civil Suit No. 10/1980 for specific performance of contract and possession. Respondent nos. 1 and 3 are the real brothers, who are the owners of the suit land. Appellants are the subsequent purchasers, who were impleaded in the suit belatedly. The Trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 12.04.2002 dismissed the suit for substantial relief of specific performance of contract and possession but awarded alternate prayer of refund of earnest amount with interest. Respondent no. 1 preferred Regular Civil Appeal No. 123/2002 and simultaneously cross objection was preferred by respondent no. 2-original plaintiff, which is ultimately allowed by the lower Appellate Court. The parties are referred to by their original status in the
The grant of specific performance is discretionary, considering undue hardship to subsequent bona fide purchasers, outweighing the plaintiff's claim based on a disputed agreement.
The court upheld that a partition among co-owners allows individual members to execute sale agreements for their shares without needing consent from others, reinforcing the enforceability of prior co....
The court upheld specific performance of a contract where the plaintiff proved payment despite the defendant's encumbrance issues, establishing that time was not of the essence in performance.
The court upheld the agreement to sell's execution and the plaintiff's readiness to perform the contract. Specific performance granted with enhanced consideration due to market changes reflecting the....
The court upheld the decree for specific performance, affirming the doctrine of lis pendens and ensuring the plaintiff's readiness to perform the contract was duly recognized.
A plaintiff seeking specific performance must demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to complete contract obligations, failing which relief may be denied.
A contract for the sale of property can only be enforced to the extent of a party's ownership rights, particularly where ancestral claims exist and co-ownership affects transactional authority.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
